FluidStack vs Vultr

A detailed comparison to help you choose between FluidStack and Vultr.

FluidStack

FluidStack

Enterprise GPU cloud at competitive pricing

Vultr

Vultr

32 datacenter locations globally

Overview
Rating3.8 (109 reviews)4.2 (499 reviews)
Pricing modelusage-basedpaid
Starting priceFree tier availableFrom €5/mo
Best forAI teams wanting flexible GPU access with EU data residency and reserved capacity for cost predictabilityApplications that need specific geographic datacenter locations — especially APAC, Africa, or South America
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores1 vCPU
RAM1 GB
Storage25 GB
Bandwidth1 TB/mo
SLA uptime99.99%
Data-center count32
€/vCPU/mo€5.00
€/GB RAM/mo€5.00
Performance
CPU score (sysbench)4,100
Disk read (fio)1,800 MB/s
Disk IOPS (4K random)38,000
Network out1 Gbps
Latency (TTFB)24 ms
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
United StatesUnited KingdomGermanyNetherlandsFranceAustralia+6
Tags
Tags
hourly billinggpu availableeu datacenterus datacenter
hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedsnapshotsbare metalgpu availables3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterterraform providerapi accesswindows available
Visit FluidStack →Visit Vultr →

FluidStack

Pros

  • + Aggregated GPU capacity — good availability
  • + EU and US options
  • + Reserved capacity discounts

Cons

  • - Aggregated model means variable hardware
  • - Newer provider
View full FluidStackreview →

Vultr

Pros

  • + 32 global datacenter locations — most in the market
  • + High Frequency NVMe plans are competitively fast
  • + Bare Metal Cloud available on-demand

Cons

  • - Bandwidth overages can get expensive on low-end plans
  • - UI less polished than DigitalOcean
View full Vultrreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.