FluidStack vs Vultr
A detailed comparison to help you choose between FluidStack and Vultr.
Quick Verdict
3.8/5
FluidStack
109 reviews
4.2/5
Vultr
499 reviews
Vultr is rated higher (4.2 vs 3.8). FluidStack aggregates GPU capacity from multiple providers to offer H100, A100, and consumer GPU instances. Pay-as-you-go and reserved capacity. EU and US datacenters with competitive pricing. Vultr is a cloud platform offering VPS, bare metal servers, and Kubernetes hosting across 32 data centers worldwide. Built for developers and businesses needing scalable, reliable compute resources with transparent billing.
FluidStack Enterprise GPU cloud at competitive pricing | Vultr High-performance cloud infrastructure with global data centers and competitive pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.8 (109 reviews) | 4.2 (499 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | usage-based | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From €5/mo |
| Best for | AI teams wanting flexible GPU access with EU data residency and reserved capacity for cost predictability | Developers and DevOps teams building applications requiring low latency across multiple regions or those prioritizing cost-effective, API-first infrastructure management. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 1 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 1 GB |
| Storage | — | 25 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 1 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.99% |
| Data-center count | — | 32 |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €5.00 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €5.00 |
| Performance | ||
| CPU score (sysbench) | — | 4,100 |
| Disk read (fio) | — | 1,800 MB/s |
| Disk IOPS (4K random) | — | 38,000 |
| Network out | — | 1 Gbps |
| Latency (TTFB) | — | 24 ms |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | United StatesUnited KingdomGermanyNetherlandsFranceAustralia+6 |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | hourly billinggpu availableeu datacenterus datacenter | hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedsnapshotsbare metalgpu availables3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterterraform providerapi accesswindows available |
| Visit FluidStack → | Visit Vultr → | |
FluidStack
Pros
- + Aggregated GPU capacity — good availability
- + EU and US options
- + Reserved capacity discounts
Cons
- - Aggregated model means variable hardware
- - Newer provider
Vultr
Pros
- + Deploy servers in 32 global locations with minimal latency
- + Access affordable pricing with hourly billing and no setup fees
- + Manage infrastructure via intuitive dashboard or REST API
- + Scale resources on-demand without contract commitments
Cons
- - Smaller ecosystem of pre-built applications compared to AWS or DigitalOcean
- - Support limited to ticketing system; no phone support on lower plans
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.