Filebase vs Wasabi
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Filebase and Wasabi.
Quick Verdict
3.5/5
Filebase
0 reviews
4.0/5
Wasabi
0 reviews
Wasabi is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.5). Filebase provides S3-compatible API over decentralized storage networks (IPFS, Sia, Storj). Redundancy through multiple blockchains. US-based with competitive pricing. S3-compatible cloud storage priced at a flat $7.99 per TB per month with no fees for downloads or API requests, widely used for backups.
Filebase S3-compatible object storage with Web3 integration and multi-cloud redundancy | Wasabi Hot cloud storage at cold storage prices | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.5 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From $7.99/mo |
| Best for | Cost-conscious teams needing S3-compatible object storage with heavy read traffic and free egress, plus Web3 projects wanting IPFS pinning and content addressing without managing gateways | Backup, offsite copy, and media-archive storage where data is written once, kept for months or years, and read occasionally — especially at 500 GB and above |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | 16 regions: US (N. Virginia x2, Texas, Oregon, California), Canada (Toronto), Netherlands (Amsterdam), Germany (Frankfurt), UK x2, France (Paris), Italy (Milan), Japan x2 (Tokyo, Osaka), Singapore, Australia (Sydney) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiers3 compatibleus datacenterapi access | s3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessgdpr compliant |
| Visit Filebase → | Visit Wasabi → | |
Filebase
Pros
- + Genuine S3 API compatibility (SigV4, AWS SDKs) — migrate in and out without re-architecting
- + Excellent price story: $0.015 per GB-month, free object egress on paid plans with no cap, free inbound and deletes
- + Straightforward plans: free 5 GB tier without a credit card, Pro at $7.50/month for 500 GB
- + IPFS integration done for you: pinning, per-bucket CIDs, gateways, IPNS names and static sites
- + Billing documentation is unusually explicit about what is metered and what is not
Cons
- - Vendor-stated 99% uptime and no public SLA — a procurement problem for regulated workloads
- - Very small company (single-digit headcount) running production storage infrastructure
- - IPFS bandwidth is billed separately: gateway, bitswap and Sites traffic can surprise you
- - No published datacenter locations or data residency guarantees
- - Limited platform beyond storage: no compute, no databases; older pages still describe tiers that no longer exist
Wasabi
Pros
- + Flat $7.99/TB/month with zero egress and API request charges — bills are predictable to the dollar
- + S3-compatible API with broad backup-software support (Veeam, rclone, Synology, MSP360 and others)
- + 16 regions with per-bucket region pinning, covering US, EU, and APAC data-residency needs
- + Credit-backed 99.9% uptime SLA with a published error-rate measurement methodology
- + No cold-tier latency: everything is hot storage, so restores are immediate
Cons
- - 90-day minimum storage duration — early deletion or overwriting incurs Timed Deleted Storage charges
- - 1 TB minimum monthly charge makes small datasets uneconomical
- - Fair-use policy implicitly caps monthly egress near stored volume — not a CDN origin play
- - Single storage tier only; no cheap cold class for rarely-retrieved archives
- - Basic support only on Pay-as-You-Go; Premium support is tied to Reserved Capacity contracts
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.