Filebase vs Wasabi
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Filebase and Wasabi.
Quick Verdict
4.9/5
Filebase
63 reviews
4.2/5
Wasabi
469 reviews
Filebase is rated higher (4.9 vs 4.2). Filebase provides S3-compatible API over decentralized storage networks (IPFS, Sia, Storj). Redundancy through multiple blockchains. US-based with competitive pricing. Wasabi charges $6.99/TB/month with no egress fees and no API call fees. S3-compatible, available in US and EU, and widely used as a backup destination.
Filebase S3-compatible object storage with Web3 integration and multi-cloud redundancy | Wasabi Hot cloud storage at cold storage prices | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.9 (63 reviews)✓ | 4.2 (469 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From €7/mo |
| Best for | Developers building decentralized apps or projects requiring multi-chain data redundancy with S3 API compatibility. | Backup storage and archiving where data is written often but read infrequently |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 0 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 0 GB |
| Storage | — | 0 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 0 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.9% |
| Data-center count | — | 8 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | United StatesNetherlandsGermanyJapanAustralia |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiers3 compatibleus datacenterapi access | s3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessgdpr compliant |
| Visit Filebase → | Visit Wasabi → | |
Filebase
Pros
- + Use existing S3 tools and SDKs without code changes
- + Automatically replicate data across decentralized networks for redundancy
- + Access files via IPFS and Arweave without separate infrastructure
- + Competitive pricing compared to traditional cloud storage providers
Cons
- - Performance may vary compared to centralized providers like AWS S3
- - Smaller ecosystem and fewer integration options than established cloud providers
- - Web3 features add complexity if only standard storage is needed
Wasabi
Pros
- + No egress fees, no API call fees
- + EU and US datacenter options
- + Very simple flat pricing
Cons
- - Minimum 90-day storage commitment — early deletion charged
- - No free tier
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.