Filebase vs Storj
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Filebase and Storj.
Quick Verdict
3.5/5
Filebase
0 reviews
3.5/5
Storj
0 reviews
Both Filebase and Storj are equally rated at 3.5/5. Filebase provides S3-compatible API over decentralized storage networks (IPFS, Sia, Storj). Redundancy through multiple blockchains. US-based with competitive pricing. Decentralized S3-compatible object storage. Data is client-side encrypted, erasure-coded, and distributed across tens of thousands of storage locations in 100+ countries. Since July 2026: $7/TB storage and $7/TB egress (Standard), 30-day free trial with 25GB, then a $5 monthly minimum.
Filebase S3-compatible object storage with Web3 integration and multi-cloud redundancy | Storj Decentralized S3-compatible cloud storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.5 (0 reviews) | 3.5 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | usage-based |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From $5/mo |
| Best for | Cost-conscious teams needing S3-compatible object storage with heavy read traffic and free egress, plus Web3 projects wanting IPFS pinning and content addressing without managing gateways | Teams storing large, write-mostly objects — backups, archives, media, datasets — who want S3-compatible storage at flat per-TB pricing with optional U.S. data residency, and accept variable performance. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiers3 compatibleus datacenterapi access | free tiers3 compatibleopen sourceeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Filebase → | Visit Storj → | |
Filebase
Pros
- + Genuine S3 API compatibility (SigV4, AWS SDKs) — migrate in and out without re-architecting
- + Excellent price story: $0.015 per GB-month, free object egress on paid plans with no cap, free inbound and deletes
- + Straightforward plans: free 5 GB tier without a credit card, Pro at $7.50/month for 500 GB
- + IPFS integration done for you: pinning, per-bucket CIDs, gateways, IPNS names and static sites
- + Billing documentation is unusually explicit about what is metered and what is not
Cons
- - Vendor-stated 99% uptime and no public SLA — a procurement problem for regulated workloads
- - Very small company (single-digit headcount) running production storage infrastructure
- - IPFS bandwidth is billed separately: gateway, bitswap and Sites traffic can surprise you
- - No published datacenter locations or data residency guarantees
- - Limited platform beyond storage: no compute, no databases; older pages still describe tiers that no longer exist
Storj
Pros
- + $7/TB storage and $7/TB egress on Standard — far below hyperscaler egress economics
- + 11 nines durability target via erasure coding across independent nodes; no single point of failure
- + S3-compatible gateway plus Object Mount (two licenses free with every account)
- + Advanced tier pins data to U.S. SOC 2 Type 2 compliant data centers for residency needs
- + Open source, client-side encryption by default, and a 30-day trial with no credit card
Cons
- - No permanent free tier — 30-day trial only, then a $5 monthly minimum fee that is not a credit
- - Pricing changed twice in a year; the 2026 migration's opt-out deletes your data within 45 days
- - 50KB object minimum and 30-day minimum retention punish small-object and churn-heavy workloads
- - Performance varies with node geography versus single-region centralized storage
- - New ownership (Inveniam, October 2025) and STORJ token economics add strategy risk
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.