Skip to content

Filebase vs Cloudflare

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Filebase and Cloudflare.

Quick Verdict

3.5/5

Filebase

0 reviews

4.3/5

Cloudflare

0 reviews

Cloudflare is rated higher (4.3 vs 3.5). Filebase provides S3-compatible API over decentralized storage networks (IPFS, Sia, Storj). Redundancy through multiple blockchains. US-based with competitive pricing. Global network that speeds up and protects websites with CDN caching, DDoS protection, free SSL and DNS. Free plan; Pro costs $20/month billed annually ($25 monthly).

Filebase

Filebase

S3-compatible object storage with Web3 integration and multi-cloud redundancy

Cloudflare

Cloudflare

Global CDN and DDoS protection with object storage

Overview
Rating3.5 (0 reviews)4.3 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium
Starting priceFree tier available✓From $20/mo
Best forCost-conscious teams needing S3-compatible object storage with heavy read traffic and free egress, plus Web3 projects wanting IPFS pinning and content addressing without managing gatewaysWebsites and SaaS front ends that want a free or flat-priced global CDN with DDoS protection and TLS included — and can accept proxying all traffic through one vendor.
Features
IPv6✓
DDoS protection✓
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions—
Global — 300+ cities
Tags
Tags
free tiers3 compatibleus datacenterapi access
free tiers3 compatibleddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessipv6terraform provider
Visit Filebase →Visit Cloudflare →

Filebase

Pros

  • + Genuine S3 API compatibility (SigV4, AWS SDKs) — migrate in and out without re-architecting
  • + Excellent price story: $0.015 per GB-month, free object egress on paid plans with no cap, free inbound and deletes
  • + Straightforward plans: free 5 GB tier without a credit card, Pro at $7.50/month for 500 GB
  • + IPFS integration done for you: pinning, per-bucket CIDs, gateways, IPNS names and static sites
  • + Billing documentation is unusually explicit about what is metered and what is not

Cons

  • - Vendor-stated 99% uptime and no public SLA — a procurement problem for regulated workloads
  • - Very small company (single-digit headcount) running production storage infrastructure
  • - IPFS bandwidth is billed separately: gateway, bitswap and Sites traffic can surprise you
  • - No published datacenter locations or data residency guarantees
  • - Limited platform beyond storage: no compute, no databases; older pages still describe tiers that no longer exist
View full Filebasereview →

Cloudflare

Pros

  • + Unmetered bandwidth and requests on every plan, including Free
  • + Free managed WAF ruleset, Universal SSL and unmetered DDoS protection by default
  • + 330+ city network with Anycast routing and no region pricing
  • + Flat per-domain pricing is easy to budget; no egress surprises
  • + Terraform provider and full API for configuration as code

Cons

  • - No uptime SLA below the Business plan
  • - Per-domain billing gets expensive for domain portfolios
  • - Advanced WAF tuning and rate limiting are plan-gated
  • - Proxy architecture is a concentration risk during network-level incidents
  • - Large feature surface means caching misconfigurations can go unnoticed
View full Cloudflarereview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.