Filebase vs Azure Blob Storage
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Filebase and Azure Blob Storage.
Quick Verdict
3.5/5
Filebase
0 reviews
3.9/5
Azure Blob Storage
0 reviews
Azure Blob Storage is rated higher (3.9 vs 3.5). Filebase provides S3-compatible API over decentralized storage networks (IPFS, Sia, Storj). Redundancy through multiple blockchains. US-based with competitive pricing. Microsoft Azure's object storage service for storing massive amounts of unstructured data like documents, images, and backups. Built for enterprises needing reliable, cost-effective cloud storage with compliance options.
Filebase S3-compatible object storage with Web3 integration and multi-cloud redundancy | Azure Blob Storage Scalable cloud object storage for unstructured data at enterprise scale | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.5 (0 reviews) | 3.9 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | usage-based |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From $0.0184/mo |
| Best for | Cost-conscious teams needing S3-compatible object storage with heavy read traffic and free egress, plus Web3 projects wanting IPFS pinning and content addressing without managing gateways | Microsoft-centric enterprises and Azure-native analytics/backup workloads needing compliant, tiered object storage with global residency |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiers3 compatibleus datacenterapi access | free tiers3 compatibleapi accesseu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterterraform provider |
| Visit Filebase → | Visit Azure Blob Storage → | |
Filebase
Pros
- + Genuine S3 API compatibility (SigV4, AWS SDKs) — migrate in and out without re-architecting
- + Excellent price story: $0.015 per GB-month, free object egress on paid plans with no cap, free inbound and deletes
- + Straightforward plans: free 5 GB tier without a credit card, Pro at $7.50/month for 500 GB
- + IPFS integration done for you: pinning, per-bucket CIDs, gateways, IPNS names and static sites
- + Billing documentation is unusually explicit about what is metered and what is not
Cons
- - Vendor-stated 99% uptime and no public SLA — a procurement problem for regulated workloads
- - Very small company (single-digit headcount) running production storage infrastructure
- - IPFS bandwidth is billed separately: gateway, bitswap and Sites traffic can surprise you
- - No published datacenter locations or data residency guarantees
- - Limited platform beyond storage: no compute, no databases; older pages still describe tiers that no longer exist
Azure Blob Storage
Pros
- + Four cost-optimized access tiers with fully published per-GB and per-operation prices
- + Mature redundancy ladder (LRS through RA-GZRS) with 11 nines claimed durability on LRS
- + Deep Azure integration: Entra ID auth, Private Link, lifecycle management, immutable storage
- + Reserved capacity discounts up to roughly a third on committed storage
- + Global footprint with EU, US, and APAC data residency plus sovereign clouds
Cons
- - No native S3 API — S3-designed tooling needs a third-party proxy
- - Egress, retrieval, and early-deletion fees often dwarf the capacity cost
- - Portal, RBAC, and account-kind surface area is a real learning curve
- - Cool/Cold/Archive tiers carry lower availability targets (99%) and minimum retention periods
- - SLA is 99.9% with capped service credits, not an availability guarantee
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.