Evolution Host vs Webdock
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Evolution Host and Webdock.
Quick Verdict
3.5/5
Evolution Host
0 reviews
3.9/5
Webdock
0 reviews
Webdock is rated higher (3.9 vs 3.5). Evolution Host provides KVM VPS and VDS with NVMe storage, included EvoShield DDoS protection and daily off-site backups across 15 locations in Europe, the US and Asia. Ireland-registered (Evolution Host Ltd); VPS plans from €5/mo. Webdock offers semi-managed KVM VPS with snapshots, daily backups, and a free control panel included. Danish company running its own DK-DC1 datacenter in Nørre Aaby since 2024, GDPR compliant, EU-only footprint.
Evolution Host High-performance VPS hosting with AMD EPYC processors and NVMe storage | Webdock Semi-managed VPS from Webdock's own Danish datacenter, with snapshots and backups included | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.5 (0 reviews) | 3.9 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $5/mo | From $2.15/mo✓ |
| Best for | Game-server operators, FiveM communities and application owners who are actively targeted by DDoS attacks and want mitigation, daily off-site backups and generous transfer included in a mid-range VPS price. | EU-based solo developers, small agencies, and founders who want a cheap, fast, semi-managed VPS in Denmark with snapshots, backups, and real human support included |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 1 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 2 GB |
| Storage | — | 15 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 1 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | 99.95%✓ | 99.9% |
| Data-center count | 15✓ | 1 |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €2.15 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €1.07 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | 15 locations across Europe, the US and Asia | Nørre Aaby, Denmark (DK-DC1, own facility) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | nvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenter | nvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedmanaged optionsnapshotseu datacentergdpr compliant |
| Visit Evolution Host → | Visit Webdock → | |
Evolution Host
Pros
- + EvoShield DDoS mitigation (layers 3/4/7, per-application profiles, documented API) included on every plan
- + Daily off-site backups to redundant storage in at least two regions are standard, not an upsell
- + Generous transfer allowances: 10TB at €5/mo up to 100TB at €100/mo, plus up to 64 IPv4 addresses
- + Published spec-and-price table with VAT included where applicable; no hidden spec rounding
- + 15 locations across three continents, with remote DDoS protection usable on infrastructure hosted elsewhere
- + KVM with genuinely dedicated resources, DDR5/NVMe, high-clock CPUs and BYOL Windows support
Cons
- - Per-euro hardware trails value leaders (1 core/1GB at €5 vs benchmarked 2 vCPU/4GB boxes at similar money)
- - SLA inconsistency: 99.95% uptime on the homepage, '100% Uptime SLA' on the VPS page, no credits document
- - Asia-Pacific locations (Singapore, India, Australia) bill at double the standard rate
- - Small company with thin corporate transparency: no founding year, directory listings disagree on the address
- - IPv6 not supported at the Helsinki and Miami locations; no Terraform/IaC story visible
Webdock
Pros
- + Own Danish datacenter (DK-DC1) — owned hardware, EU data residency, GDPR by design
- + Aggressive value: €2.15/mo entry plan with SSL, daily backups, and 5 automated + 3 on-demand snapshots included
- + Semi-managed support that users rate highly, plus a free in-house control panel instead of paid cPanel
- + Transparent pricing: no renewal hikes, no transfer fees, month-to-month with optional discounts for longer terms
- + Profile Builder lets you tune CPU/RAM/disk/bandwidth with live pricing and snapshot rollback
Cons
- - Single datacenter only — the Finland location was retired, so there is no geographic redundancy or non-EU region
- - 99.9% uptime is a stated target without a formal credit-backed SLA document we could find
- - 1 TB outgoing transfer cap on the small plans is tight for media-heavy workloads
- - Small vendor (~19 staff) with no managed Kubernetes, object storage, or global network products
- - Pricing page lists identical memory/disk figures for Essential and Advanced as published — confirm exact specs before purchase
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.