Equinix Colocation vs Vultr Bare Metal
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Equinix Colocation and Vultr Bare Metal.
Quick Verdict
4.6/5
Equinix Colocation
343 reviews
5.0/5
Vultr Bare Metal
84 reviews
Vultr Bare Metal is rated higher (5.0 vs 4.6). Equinix is the world's largest colocation provider with 240 International Business Exchange (IBX) datacenters globally. Direct cloud on-ramps to AWS, Azure, GCP, and private network peering. Vultr's bare metal offering provides dedicated physical servers without virtualization overhead. Ideal for compute-intensive workloads, databases, and applications requiring predictable performance and full hardware control.
Equinix Colocation World's largest colocation network — 240 datacenters | Vultr Bare Metal High-performance bare metal servers with hourly billing and global deployment | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.6 (343 reviews) | 5.0 (84 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €500/mo | From €120/mo✓ |
| Best for | Enterprises needing colocation in a neutral facility with direct connections to cloud providers | Engineering teams running database clusters, machine learning pipelines, or distributed computing tasks that need predictable performance and low latency across multiple regions. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | eu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterprivate networking | hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Equinix Colocation → | Visit Vultr Bare Metal → | |
Equinix Colocation
Pros
- + 240 datacenters globally
- + Direct cloud connectivity to all major providers
- + Network peering at massive scale
Cons
- - Very expensive for small deployments
- - Enterprise-only pricing
Vultr Bare Metal
Pros
- + Deploy in 30+ geographic regions with consistent API and control panel
- + Access dedicated CPU and memory without resource contention
- + Switch between hourly and monthly billing to match project duration
- + Manage multiple servers programmatically via REST API or CLI
Cons
- - Higher per-server cost compared to shared hosting or cloud instances
- - Requires technical knowledge for OS provisioning and server management
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.