Skip to content

Equinix Colocation vs Cherry Servers

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Equinix Colocation and Cherry Servers.

Quick Verdict

4.0/5

Equinix Colocation

0 reviews

4.0/5

Cherry Servers

0 reviews

Both Equinix Colocation and Cherry Servers are equally rated at 4.0/5. Equinix is the world's largest colocation provider with 270+ International Business Exchange (IBX) data centers globally (investor materials cite ~280 across 77 metros in 36 countries). Direct cloud on-ramps to AWS, Azure, GCP, and private network peering. Lithuanian provider of bare-metal dedicated servers and cloud VPS in Europe, the US and Singapore, with hourly or monthly billing. Cloud VPS from about $3.24 per month.

Equinix Colocation

Equinix Colocation

World's largest colocation network — 270+ data centers

Cherry Servers

Cherry Servers

Bare-metal & cloud servers

Overview
Rating4.0 (0 reviews)4.0 (0 reviews)
Pricing modelpaidpaid
Starting priceFree tier availableFrom $3.24/mo
Best forEnterprises whose infrastructure strategy depends on interconnection — financial services, networks, content platforms and multi-cloud architectures needing private on-ramps and a consistent global footprint of cabinets and cross-connects.Developers and teams needing customizable bare-metal and cloud VPS with hourly billing, generous egress, and EU data residency
Features
IPv6✓
DDoS protection✓
Automated backups✓
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing✓
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions—
Lithuania, Amsterdam, Chicago, Singapore, Stockholm, Frankfurt, Tokyo
Tags
Tags
eu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterprivate networking
—
Visit Equinix Colocation →

Equinix Colocation

Pros

  • + Unmatched interconnection density: 507,000+ interconnections, 2,000+ networks, direct cloud on-ramps
  • + Published facility engineering: 99.999% stated uptime, N+1 power minimum, 24/7 on-site security
  • + Global consistency — 270+ IBX locations across the Americas, Europe and Asia-Pacific
  • + Facility-level detail (seismic ratings, power architecture, certifications) is public, not deck-only
  • + Mature operational services: remote hands, cross-connect provisioning, staging and shipping
  • + 96% renewable energy across global operations, reported by a listed company (Nasdaq: EQIX)

Cons

  • - No public pricing — sales-led, multi-year contracts; premium pricing in every metro
  • - No self-service or hourly entry point; unsuitable for small deployments
  • - Cross-connects, remote hands and expansion reservations add materially to the headline cost
  • - Physical and contractual lock-in once cabling and cross-connects are established
  • - Portfolio complexity (Fabric, Network Edge, Metal, xScale) blurs what is included in a colo contract
View full Equinix Colocationreview →

Cherry Servers

Pros

  • + Low entry pricing: Cloud VPS from $3.24-3.51/mo, custom dedicated from $0.098/hr, with hourly billing
  • + Up to 100 TB free egress per dedicated server; extra traffic from €0.50/TB — friendly to bandwidth-heavy workloads
  • + 99.97% financially backed uptime SLA and default DDoS protection at no extra cost
  • + Bare metal breadth: instant and fully custom builds up to 128 cores / 1152 GB RAM with optional GPUs
  • + Seven locations across EU, US, and Asia; personal account manager and 24/7 chat for every customer

Cons

  • - No managed Kubernetes, no S3-compatible object storage, no hyperscaler service ecosystem
  • - Mid-sized provider (~60 staff); support depth beyond chat and account management is limited
  • - Product pages are inconsistent (region counts, $3.24 vs $3.51 entry price) — the configurator is ground truth
  • - Wide plan menu (spot, outlet, instant, custom, fixed-term vs on-demand) makes comparison effortful
View full Cherry Serversreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.