Elestio vs Shuttle
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Elestio and Shuttle.
Quick Verdict
3.6/5
Elestio
0 reviews
3.4/5
Shuttle
0 reviews
Elestio is rated higher (3.6 vs 3.4). 400+ open source tools Shuttle deploys Rust backend services with zero configuration — annotate your code with macros and Shuttle handles the infrastructure. No YAML, no Terraform. Pay-per-use serverless Rust.
Elestio Fully managed open source tools in one click | Shuttle Deploy Rust backends from your code — no config | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.4 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | freemium |
| Starting price | From $11/mo | Free tier available✓ |
| Best for | Developers and small teams wanting managed open source tool deployment without DevOps hires, especially on infrastructure they already own | Rust developers — solo or small teams — who want a backend live in minutes from annotated code and can accept a London-only region and no contractual uptime guarantee. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 0 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 1 GB |
| Storage | — | 1 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | — |
| Data-center count | 100✓ | 1 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €0.00 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | 100+ regions across 9+ providers (Netcup, Hetzner, DigitalOcean, AWS Lightsail, Linode, Vultr, Azure, Scaleway); BYO infrastructure supported | AWS eu-west-2 (London) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged optionopen sourceapi access | free tieropen sourceus datacenter |
| Visit Elestio → | Visit Shuttle → | |
Elestio
Pros
- + 400+ open source tools fully managed: daily backups, auto SSL, tested updates, patching, 24/7 monitoring
- + Deploy on 9+ cloud providers across 100+ regions — or bring your own infrastructure and keep ownership
- + Transparent management-fee formula ($5/vCPU + $2.50/GB RAM + $0.025/GB disk monthly) and hourly billing
- + Dedicated VMs, not shared containers; everything included with no per-seat charges
- + Revenue sharing with open source authors supports the projects being hosted
Cons
- - Young, small company (founded 2022, ~11-50 employees) — vendor risk for mission-critical platforms
- - No uptime SLA at base level; 99.5%/99.9% SLAs cost $50/$200 per service per month
- - Catalog covers mainstream self-hosted apps; heavily customized or niche software fits poorly
- - Underlying infrastructure costs are on top in the bring-your-own model, so totals vary by provider
Shuttle
Pros
- + Infrastructure from code annotations: databases, secrets and static assets provisioned from function signatures, no YAML or Terraform
- + Real free tier (0.25 vCPU, 0.5 GB RAM, 0.5 GB database, 100 build minutes/month) with custom domain support
- + Published, itemized usage rates ($0.12/GB storage, $0.025/build minute, $0.10/GB egress) instead of sales-quoted pricing
- + Clear isolation tiering: spot instances on free, reserved VM-isolated instances from Pro
- + First-class Rust framework support (Axum, Actix Web, Rocket, Serenity) and open-source platform code
Cons
- - Rust only — other language stacks are not supported today
- - Single AWS region (London, eu-west-2) with no region choice below the not-yet-available Enterprise tier
- - No published uptime SLA on any current tier; support is Discord-based with 1-business-day response on Pro
- - Steep jump from $20/mo Pro to $250/mo Growth, with metered usage on top of every paid tier
- - Tier contents have changed materially over time (projects and included egress were cut in 2025)
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.