Amazon EKS vs Linode Kubernetes Engine
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Amazon EKS and Linode Kubernetes Engine.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
Amazon EKS
0 reviews
4.0/5
Linode Kubernetes Engine
0 reviews
Linode Kubernetes Engine is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.9). Managed Kubernetes service that handles cluster operations, patching, and scaling. For teams running containerized workloads who want to reduce Kubernetes infrastructure overhead. Linode Kubernetes Engine (LKE) offers managed Kubernetes with free control plane — pay only for worker nodes. HA control plane available, auto node recycling, and Akamai CDN integration.
 Amazon EKS AWS-managed Kubernetes with automatic control plane patching and scaling | Linode Kubernetes Engine Managed Kubernetes with free control plane | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $73/mo | From $5/mo✓ |
| Best for | Organizations already committed to AWS who need production Kubernetes without managing the control plane infrastructure | Teams that want production Kubernetes without paying hyperscaler control-plane fees, especially small-to-mid clusters, bursty dev/test fleets and GPU inference workloads. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | managed optionapi accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenterterraform provider | managed optionhourly billingeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Amazon EKS → | Visit Linode Kubernetes Engine → | |
Amazon EKS
Pros
- + AWS-managed control plane across three AZs: no etcd, API server or upgrade operations
- + Upstream-conformant Kubernetes — standard manifests, operators and CNCF tooling work unchanged
- + Public, simple cluster fee ($0.10/hour) with no per-seat charges and no overage premiums on usage
- + Choice of EC2 managed node groups (including GPU and Graviton), Fargate serverless pods or Auto Mode
- + Deep AWS integration: IAM auth, VPC networking, EBS/ECR, Shield Standard DDoS protection, 39 regions
Cons
- - Extended support jumps to $0.60/hour per cluster after 14 months if versions are not upgraded
- - Total cost dominated by compute, storage and inter-AZ data transfer; bills are hard to forecast
- - Real AWS coupling through IAM, CSI drivers and ingress controllers despite Kubernetes conformance
- - Human support requires paid AWS Support plans on top of the platform costs
Linode Kubernetes Engine
Pros
- + Free managed control plane — no per-cluster fee on the standard tier
- + Transparent pricing: worker nodes billed at standard plan rates, hourly up to a monthly cap
- + Current-generation GPU node pools (RTX 4000 Ada, RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell) for AI workloads
- + CNCF-certified, upstream-compatible Kubernetes with API/CLI/Terraform automation
- + 33 core regions on third-party counts, with IPv6 on every instance
Cons
- - Standard control plane is not replicated and carries no uptime SLA
- - HA upgrade is one-way: nodes are rebuilt and local storage erased
- - No GKE Autopilot-style abstraction and fewer managed add-ons than hyperscaler K8s
- - Newest G8 plans bundle no transfer; egress at $0.005/GB can dominate traffic-heavy bills
- - LKE Enterprise (the tier with VPC isolation and Cilium) has limited availability
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.