Amazon EKS vs DigitalOcean Kubernetes
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Amazon EKS and DigitalOcean Kubernetes.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
Amazon EKS
0 reviews
3.8/5
DigitalOcean Kubernetes
0 reviews
Amazon EKS is rated higher (3.9 vs 3.8). Managed Kubernetes service that handles cluster operations, patching, and scaling. For teams running containerized workloads who want to reduce Kubernetes infrastructure overhead. DigitalOcean Kubernetes (DOKS) is one of the most affordable managed Kubernetes services. No cluster management fee — pay only for worker nodes. Integrates with DO load balancers, volumes, and container registry.
 Amazon EKS AWS-managed Kubernetes with automatic control plane patching and scaling | DigitalOcean Kubernetes Managed Kubernetes from $12/month | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.8 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $73/mo | From $12/mo✓ |
| Best for | Organizations already committed to AWS who need production Kubernetes without managing the control plane infrastructure | Startups and small teams deploying managed Kubernetes for the first time who want a free control plane and Droplet-priced nodes without hyperscaler pricing or complexity. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | managed optionapi accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenterterraform provider | managed optionhourly billingeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessterraform provider |
| Visit Amazon EKS → | Visit DigitalOcean Kubernetes → | |
Amazon EKS
Pros
- + AWS-managed control plane across three AZs: no etcd, API server or upgrade operations
- + Upstream-conformant Kubernetes — standard manifests, operators and CNCF tooling work unchanged
- + Public, simple cluster fee ($0.10/hour) with no per-seat charges and no overage premiums on usage
- + Choice of EC2 managed node groups (including GPU and Graviton), Fargate serverless pods or Auto Mode
- + Deep AWS integration: IAM auth, VPC networking, EBS/ECR, Shield Standard DDoS protection, 39 regions
Cons
- - Extended support jumps to $0.60/hour per cluster after 14 months if versions are not upgraded
- - Total cost dominated by compute, storage and inter-AZ data transfer; bills are hard to forecast
- - Real AWS coupling through IAM, CSI drivers and ingress controllers despite Kubernetes conformance
- - Human support requires paid AWS Support plans on top of the platform costs
DigitalOcean Kubernetes
Pros
- + No cluster management fee — free control plane, pay only for worker nodes
- + Worker nodes billed per second from $12/month with a 672-hour monthly cap
- + CNCF-certified Kubernetes with automatic patch upgrades and close upstream version tracking
- + Integrated load balancers, block storage, firewalls, and container registry with one API and CLI
- + Free built-in cluster monitoring with Slack/email alerts
- + Node pools span Basic to GPU (H100) Droplets, including isolated nodes with no public IP
Cons
- - Realistic production clusters cost $60-90/month once nodes, the $12/month load balancer, and storage are counted
- - Autoscaling is less sophisticated than EKS/GKE; no serverless pods or node auto-provisioning
- - No Windows or bare-metal worker nodes
- - Version support windows follow upstream strictly — clusters must keep upgrading
- - Standard support is ticket-based with no Kubernetes-specific enterprise tier
- - HA control plane status versus the 99.95% SLA is ambiguous across official pages
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.