Duplicati vs Wasabi
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Duplicati and Wasabi.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Duplicati
0 reviews
4.0/5
Wasabi
0 reviews
Both Duplicati and Wasabi are equally rated at 4.0/5. Duplicati is a free, open source backup client that stores encrypted, compressed backups to local drives or cloud storage (S3, B2, Google Drive, OneDrive, and more). Web-based UI. S3-compatible cloud storage priced at a flat $7.99 per TB per month with no fees for downloads or API requests, widely used for backups.
Duplicati Free open source backup to any cloud storage | Wasabi Hot cloud storage at cold storage prices | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From $7.99/mo |
| Best for | Home users and small businesses wanting free, encrypted, bring-your-own-storage backups with a GUI and a scriptable CLI | Backup, offsite copy, and media-archive storage where data is written once, kept for months or years, and read occasionally — especially at 500 GB and above |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | 16 regions: US (N. Virginia x2, Texas, Oregon, California), Canada (Toronto), Netherlands (Amsterdam), Germany (Frankfurt), UK x2, France (Paris), Italy (Milan), Japan x2 (Tokyo, Osaka), Singapore, Australia (Sydney) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen source | s3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessgdpr compliant |
| Visit Duplicati → | Visit Wasabi → | |
Duplicati
Pros
- + Client is completely free (MIT core) — you only pay your storage provider
- + Client-side AES-256/GPG encryption with keys that never leave your machine
- + Wide backend coverage: S3, B2, Azure, Google Drive, OneDrive, MEGA, Storj, WebDAV, SFTP, FTP and more
- + Incremental backups, deduplication, compression and scheduling keep storage costs low
- + Cheap tenant backup for Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace at $0.50 per user per month
Cons
- - Local metadata database can desync after interrupted runs; repair on large sets is slow
- - Years of 2.x beta left a mixed reliability reputation that newer releases have had to overcome
- - Free-tier support is community-only (forum, GitHub issues); priority support is a paid console feature
- - Open-core split: parts of the repository (console stack) are under the company's license, not MIT
Wasabi
Pros
- + Flat $7.99/TB/month with zero egress and API request charges — bills are predictable to the dollar
- + S3-compatible API with broad backup-software support (Veeam, rclone, Synology, MSP360 and others)
- + 16 regions with per-bucket region pinning, covering US, EU, and APAC data-residency needs
- + Credit-backed 99.9% uptime SLA with a published error-rate measurement methodology
- + No cold-tier latency: everything is hot storage, so restores are immediate
Cons
- - 90-day minimum storage duration — early deletion or overwriting incurs Timed Deleted Storage charges
- - 1 TB minimum monthly charge makes small datasets uneconomical
- - Fair-use policy implicitly caps monthly egress near stored volume — not a CDN origin play
- - Single storage tier only; no cheap cold class for rarely-retrieved archives
- - Basic support only on Pay-as-You-Go; Premium support is tied to Reserved Capacity contracts
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.