Duplicati vs Acronis Cyber Protect
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Duplicati and Acronis Cyber Protect.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Duplicati
0 reviews
3.6/5
Acronis Cyber Protect
0 reviews
Duplicati is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.6). Duplicati is a free, open source backup client that stores encrypted, compressed backups to local drives or cloud storage (S3, B2, Google Drive, OneDrive, and more). Web-based UI. Acronis Cyber Protect combines backup with AI-based malware and ransomware protection. Physical, virtual, and cloud workload backup with 50+ cloud storage destinations.
Duplicati Free open source backup to any cloud storage | Acronis Cyber Protect Backup with built-in anti-malware protection | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.6 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From $85/mo |
| Best for | Home users and small businesses wanting free, encrypted, bring-your-own-storage backups with a GUI and a scriptable CLI | IT teams and MSPs running mixed physical, virtual, and Microsoft 365 estates who want backup and endpoint protection consolidated into one console, with control over where backup data is stored. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | Acronis-operated sites plus Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure regions (26 data centers per 2021 briefing), incl. Singapore, Japan, Australia |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen source | mobile appteam features |
| Visit Duplicati → | Visit Acronis Cyber Protect → | |
Duplicati
Pros
- + Client is completely free (MIT core) — you only pay your storage provider
- + Client-side AES-256/GPG encryption with keys that never leave your machine
- + Wide backend coverage: S3, B2, Azure, Google Drive, OneDrive, MEGA, Storj, WebDAV, SFTP, FTP and more
- + Incremental backups, deduplication, compression and scheduling keep storage costs low
- + Cheap tenant backup for Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace at $0.50 per user per month
Cons
- - Local metadata database can desync after interrupted runs; repair on large sets is slow
- - Years of 2.x beta left a mixed reliability reputation that newer releases have had to overcome
- - Free-tier support is community-only (forum, GitHub issues); priority support is a paid console feature
- - Open-core split: parts of the repository (console stack) are under the company's license, not MIT
Acronis Cyber Protect
Pros
- + Backup and endpoint security (anti-malware, patch management, EDR on Advanced) unified in one agent and console
- + Wide storage flexibility: 26+ Acronis/Google/Azure data centers plus S3, Wasabi, Swift, NFS and on-prem S3-compatible destinations
- + Image-based backups with incremental chains, deduplication, and pre-restore malware scanning fit ransomware recovery planning
- + Coverage across Windows/Linux servers, VMs, workstations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, NAS, and mobile
- + Two licensing models (per-workload and per-GB) let matching your workload shape cut costs significantly
Cons
- - Licensing matrix is genuinely confusing; server protection at roughly $595–$925/server/year dwarfs workstation pricing
- - The combined agent can be heavy on CPU and memory on constrained endpoints
- - Backup-only buyers pay for a security platform they may not want; console complexity reflects five jobs in one product
- - Vendor scale figures and destination counts are marketing claims with limited independent verification
- - Support and SLA terms differ between direct business products and the service-provider platform
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.