Divio vs LucidLink
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Divio and LucidLink.
Quick Verdict
3.5/5
Divio
0 reviews
4.0/5
LucidLink
0 reviews
LucidLink is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.5). Divio is a Swiss cloud PaaS focused on Python and Django applications. Wagtail CMS hosting specialists. Strong in European enterprise Django deployments with multi-cloud options. LucidLink turns S3 object storage into a shared, streaming cloud filesystem for teams working with large files.
Divio Cloud PaaS for Django, Wagtail, and Python | LucidLink Cloud file streaming for teams: a shared filesystem on top of S3 object storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.5 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $10/mo | From $7/mo✓ |
| Best for | Digital agencies and European enterprises running multiple Django or Wagtail estates who want managed multi-environment hosting with EU data residency and cloud-vendor flexibility. | Creative and production teams (video, audio, VFX, design) with large shared files and distributed members who need one live filesystem without syncing or shipping drives. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenter | — |
| Visit Divio → | ||
Divio
Pros
- + Two decades of Django expertise — created django CMS, tooling designed around agency workflows
- + Multi-cloud on AWS, Exoscale, or Azure with one-click region/vendor migration (CloudShift)
- + Third-party IaaS passed through at cost with no markup — unusual pricing transparency
- + EU data residency (Switzerland, Germany), ISO 27001 certified, GDPR compliant
- + Managed databases, environments, backups, and workers in one project model
- + Named support channels (Swiss and US phone lines) with defined response-time tiers
Cons
- - Three stacked pricing layers (hosting + features + support) make the real bill much larger than the headline
- - No permanent free plan; the Lite plan (256 MB RAM, 250 MB database) is not production-grade
- - Soft uptime story: 99.50% expected infrastructure uptime, no credited SLA outside enterprise
- - Python/Django-centric despite added stack support; small integration ecosystem (11 documented integrations)
- - Abstraction layer between you and the underlying cloud provider limits access to native services
- - Parent company is Swedish-listed (Stockholm) despite the Swiss-origin branding
LucidLink
Pros
- + Streams large shared files on demand — no full downloads before work starts
- + Zero-knowledge encryption: the vendor cannot read customer content
- + Transparent published per-member pricing with included storage per seat
- + Built on S3, with bring-your-own-S3 on Enterprise for storage-substrate flexibility
- + 30-day free trial without a credit card; desktop, mobile and web clients
- + TeamCache add-on brings cloud files to on-prem users at LAN speed
Cons
- - Storage overage of $7-8 per 100 GB is roughly $70-80 per TB per month — far above raw S3
- - Starter tier is tightly capped: 10 members, 1 filespace, 1 TB, and no snapshot recovery
- - Specialized for file-streaming workloads; wrong shape for databases or block storage
- - No published region list or public uptime SLA outside Enterprise discussions
- - Client and control-plane dependency on a mid-size specialist vendor
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.