Divio vs Cloudflare Pages
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Divio and Cloudflare Pages.
Quick Verdict
3.5/5
Divio
0 reviews
4.3/5
Cloudflare Pages
0 reviews
Cloudflare Pages is rated higher (4.3 vs 3.5). Divio is a Swiss cloud PaaS focused on Python and Django applications. Wagtail CMS hosting specialists. Strong in European enterprise Django deployments with multi-cloud options. Cloudflare Pages is a JAMstack platform for deploying websites directly from Git repositories. Built-in CI/CD, global CDN, and serverless functions for developers and teams of any size.
Divio Cloud PaaS for Django, Wagtail, and Python | Cloudflare Pages Deploy static and dynamic sites with zero configuration | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.5 (0 reviews) | 4.3 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | freemium |
| Starting price | From $10/mo | Free tier available✓ |
| Best for | Digital agencies and European enterprises running multiple Django or Wagtail estates who want managed multi-environment hosting with EU data residency and cloud-vendor flexibility. | Front-end teams, docs and marketing sites, and JAMstack projects that want global delivery and git-based deploys with no servers to run — especially those already inside the Cloudflare ecosystem. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenter | free tiereu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Divio → | Visit Cloudflare Pages → | |
Divio
Pros
- + Two decades of Django expertise — created django CMS, tooling designed around agency workflows
- + Multi-cloud on AWS, Exoscale, or Azure with one-click region/vendor migration (CloudShift)
- + Third-party IaaS passed through at cost with no markup — unusual pricing transparency
- + EU data residency (Switzerland, Germany), ISO 27001 certified, GDPR compliant
- + Managed databases, environments, backups, and workers in one project model
- + Named support channels (Swiss and US phone lines) with defined response-time tiers
Cons
- - Three stacked pricing layers (hosting + features + support) make the real bill much larger than the headline
- - No permanent free plan; the Lite plan (256 MB RAM, 250 MB database) is not production-grade
- - Soft uptime story: 99.50% expected infrastructure uptime, no credited SLA outside enterprise
- - Python/Django-centric despite added stack support; small integration ecosystem (11 documented integrations)
- - Abstraction layer between you and the underlying cloud provider limits access to native services
- - Parent company is Swedish-listed (Stockholm) despite the Swiss-origin branding
Cloudflare Pages
Pros
- + Unlimited sites, seats, requests and bandwidth even on the free tier
- + Preview deployment for every commit, unlimited previews on all plans
- + Pages Functions run on the Workers runtime with KV, D1, Durable Objects and R2 bindings
- + Builds and TLS are fully managed; zero server configuration
- + Flat plan pricing — delivery volume never changes the bill
Cons
- - Build limits (500/month Free) bind long before bandwidth does
- - 20,000-file and 25 MiB per-file ceilings push media-heavy sites to R2
- - Hard platform boundary: no persistent servers, no arbitrary runtimes
- - Shared build infrastructure can queue during peak periods
- - No uptime SLA below the Business plan
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.