Directus vs CockroachDB
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Directus and CockroachDB.
Quick Verdict
3.6/5
Directus
0 reviews
4.2/5
CockroachDB
0 reviews
CockroachDB is rated higher (4.2 vs 3.6). Directus wraps any SQL database with a no-code data studio, REST and GraphQL API, and file management. Open source and self-hostable. Directus Cloud is managed hosting. CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built to survive datacenter failures. Postgres-compatible, strong consistency, and automatic scaling across regions. Managed plans: Basic (usage-based, free tier), Standard and Advanced (provisioned), plus BYOC and the new Cockroach Continuum editions.
Directus Open-source headless CMS and database API | CockroachDB Distributed SQL database that survives failures | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (0 reviews) | 4.2 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Development teams with existing SQL databases who want an admin UI and API layer without building one, and small organizations that qualify for free self-hosting with full data control. | Applications where the database must survive region loss without losing transactions — payments, ledgers, identity, multi-region SaaS, global gaming backends — and teams ready for distributed-SQL trade-offs |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 2 vCPU |
| RAM | — | — |
| Storage | — | — |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.99% |
| Data-center count | — | — |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €0.00 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | AWS, GCP and Azure regions across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific (multi-region clusters) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access | free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Directus → | Visit CockroachDB → | |
Directus
Pros
- + Wraps any existing SQL database — no proprietary data store, no forced migration, full data ownership
- + Auto-generated REST and GraphQL APIs with granular RBAC, audit logging, webhooks, and built-in Flows automation
- + Free self-hosting under Core / Open Innovation Grant for small organizations; every release converts to GPL-3.0 after four years
- + Directus Cloud is genuinely managed: provisioning in about 90 seconds, automatic updates, scaling, and backups
- + The Studio admin UI gives non-technical editors a real interface over a relational model
- + Honest communication about licensing — the team states plainly that it is not OSI-certified open source
Cons
- - No longer OSI open source: MSCL/BSL custom licenses with a $5M total-finances commercial trigger
- - Directus Cloud is costly versus raw resources: $99/month buys 5 seats, 75,000 entries, 250,000 API requests
- - API request and entry caps on paid plans punish high-volume production workloads
- - Complex permission hierarchies and Flows have a real learning curve; self-hosted production is DevOps work
- - No published uptime SLA outside Enterprise agreements
- - Ecosystem and community smaller than Strapi's; licensing changes have churned community trust
CockroachDB
Pros
- + True multi-region survivability with serializable transactions and Postgres wire compatibility
- + Generous free tier: Basic at $0/month with 50M RUs and 10 GiB free monthly, $400 trial credits, no card required
- + Contractual SLAs: 99.99% availability, up to 99.999% multi-region on Advanced; P1 response targets published
- + Transparent per-component cost documentation and a public pricing calculator
- + Enterprise compliance path (CMEK, PCI DSS, HIPAA) and AWS/GCP/Azure coverage
Cons
- - Production costs climb fast: storage billed at 4.5x durability multiplier, plus backups, CDC and egress
- - September 2026 plan restructure (Cockroach Continuum) splits new and existing customers onto different rate cards
- - Distributed-SQL learning curve: RU model, planner differences from vanilla Postgres, cross-region latency
- - Overkill for single-region applications — managed Postgres is far cheaper for the same job
- - Proprietary managed plane; open-core self-hosting shifts the operational burden back to you
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.