Devilbox vs Pressable
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Devilbox and Pressable.
Quick Verdict
3.6/5
Devilbox
0 reviews
4.3/5
Pressable
0 reviews
Pressable is rated higher (4.3 vs 3.6). Devilbox is a free, open source Docker PHP development environment for local WordPress and PHP development. Pre-configured with Nginx/Apache, MySQL, PHP, and email testing. Pressable is a managed WordPress host owned by Automattic (the company behind WordPress.com and WooCommerce). Jetpack included, automatic updates, and 24/7 expert WordPress support with direct Automattic connection.
Devilbox Docker-based local development environment for multiple PHP stacks | Pressable Automattic-owned managed WordPress | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (0 reviews) | 4.3 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | free | paid |
| Starting price | Free✓ | From $8.33/mo |
| Best for | WordPress and PHP freelancers, agencies and plugin shops running many projects across multiple PHP versions who want one reproducible, zero-config local environment. | WooCommerce stores and business WordPress sites where uptime and WordPress-specific expertise matter more than rock-bottom pricing |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 5 vCPU |
| RAM | — | — |
| Storage | — | 20 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | 100% |
| Data-center count | — | 4 |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €1.67 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | Los AngelesDallasAshburnAmsterdam |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen source | managed optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenter |
| Visit Devilbox → | Visit Pressable → | |
Devilbox
Pros
- + Completely free and MIT-licensed with public source — no paid tier or account required
- + Automatic vhosts, DNS and browser-trusted SSL for unlimited projects with zero manual configuration
- + Per-project PHP version switching across 5.2 to 8.2, plus five database engines and profiling tools
- + Reproducible environments that eliminate drift between developers and between local and production
- + Nightly automated image builds with CI tests on both amd64 and arm64 architectures
Cons
- - Upstream maintenance has slowed — last recorded push April 2024, PHP images stop at 8.2
- - Requires Docker and Compose literacy; debugging container issues is on you
- - Resource-hungry: a full stack wants 6-8 GB of free RAM plus disk for images and data
- - No managed option, no vendor, no support contract behind the project
- - PHP-centric despite extra language backends — wrong shape for non-PHP stacks
Pressable
Pros
- + WP Cloud architecture with per-site primary/secondary servers and automatic failover
- + Strong entry-tier value versus WP Engine: more visits, more storage, unmetered bandwidth, lower renewal price
- + Hourly database backups, staging plus sandbox per site, Jetpack Security, WAF and DDoS protection on every plan
- + Annual price is the renewal price — no teaser-rate doubling
- + Automattic-owned: WordPress and WooCommerce expertise sits in the support chain
Cons
- - WordPress and WooCommerce only — nothing else runs here
- - Visit-based overage billing and storage that excludes databases make real costs higher than headlines
- - Email costs extra ($3.50/month per inbox); some plan tiers surface inconsistently across the site
- - Premium tier is sales-gated and pricing surface is mid-restructure
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.