Deno Deploy vs Cloudflare Workers
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Deno Deploy and Cloudflare Workers.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
Deno Deploy
0 reviews
4.3/5
Cloudflare Workers
0 reviews
Cloudflare Workers is rated higher (4.3 vs 3.9). Deno Deploy runs JavaScript and TypeScript serverless functions at the edge using the Deno runtime. Near-instant cold starts via V8 isolates, globally distributed across 30+ anycast regions, with Node/npm compatibility. Free for low-traffic apps. Run JavaScript, Python, and Rust functions at the edge with sub-millisecond latency. Ideal for APIs, middleware, and full-stack applications needing global distribution.
Deno Deploy Deno JavaScript runtime at the edge globally | Cloudflare Workers Deploy serverless code globally on Cloudflare's edge network | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews) | 4.3 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | TypeScript-first teams shipping globally distributed APIs, SSR apps and webhooks who want zero infrastructure management — and platforms embedding user-run code via Subhosting. | Latency-sensitive APIs, middleware, edge rendering and full-stack applications that want global deployment with no infrastructure to run — especially teams already using Cloudflare's storage and CDN products. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 10 vCPU |
| RAM | — | — |
| Storage | — | 1 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | 99.95% | 100%✓ |
| Data-center count | — | 330 |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €0.00 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | Global — 300+ cities |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tierddos protectionipv6eu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessopen source |
| Visit Deno Deploy → | Visit Cloudflare Workers → | |
Deno Deploy
Pros
- + V8 isolate architecture gives near-instant cold starts, second-scale deploys and automatic global replication
- + Genuinely usable free tier (1M requests/mo) and an honest $20/mo Pro plan with clear overage rates
- + Active-CPU billing instead of wall-clock billing rewards efficient handlers and makes idle apps free
- + TypeScript-native workflow with Deno's permission-based security model and broad Node/npm compatibility
- + Battle-tested substrate — Netlify edge functions run on the same infrastructure at 255M+ requests/day
Cons
- - Node compatibility is broad but not total — native modules and Node-specific tooling can still break
- - 99.95% SLA and SOC 2 Type 1 are Enterprise-only; Free and Pro have no contractual guarantee
- - The company has announced it is joining Cloudflare, adding platform-roadmap uncertainty
- - Not suited to long-running, connection-heavy or GPU workloads
- - Small-plan limits (one concurrent build on Free, low build-per-hour caps) can pinch teams
Cloudflare Workers
Pros
- + No cold starts: V8 isolates start in microseconds at 330+ locations
- + CPU-time billing with a genuinely usable free tier (100k requests/day)
- + No egress or bandwidth charges on any plan
- + Storage stack (KV, D1, Durable Objects, R2) binds declaratively and stays in-network
- + Strong docs: pricing and limits pages are explicit and example-driven
Cons
- - CPU time caps exclude compute-heavy and long-running workloads
- - Real vendor lock-in through Durable Objects, bindings and deployment model
- - KV writes ($5.00/M) and Durable Objects duration billing surprise stateful designs
- - Conceptual shift for teams used to container-based serverless
- - No uptime SLA below the Business plan
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.