Deno Deploy vs Cloudflare
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Deno Deploy and Cloudflare.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
Deno Deploy
0 reviews
4.3/5
Cloudflare
0 reviews
Cloudflare is rated higher (4.3 vs 3.9). Deno Deploy runs JavaScript and TypeScript serverless functions at the edge using the Deno runtime. Near-instant cold starts via V8 isolates, globally distributed across 30+ anycast regions, with Node/npm compatibility. Free for low-traffic apps. Global network that speeds up and protects websites with CDN caching, DDoS protection, free SSL and DNS. Free plan; Pro costs $20/month billed annually ($25 monthly).
Deno Deploy Deno JavaScript runtime at the edge globally | Cloudflare Global CDN and DDoS protection with object storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews) | 4.3 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From $20/mo |
| Best for | TypeScript-first teams shipping globally distributed APIs, SSR apps and webhooks who want zero infrastructure management — and platforms embedding user-run code via Subhosting. | Websites and SaaS front ends that want a free or flat-priced global CDN with DDoS protection and TLS included — and can accept proxying all traffic through one vendor. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | Global — 300+ cities |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tiers3 compatibleddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessipv6terraform provider |
| Visit Deno Deploy → | Visit Cloudflare → | |
Deno Deploy
Pros
- + V8 isolate architecture gives near-instant cold starts, second-scale deploys and automatic global replication
- + Genuinely usable free tier (1M requests/mo) and an honest $20/mo Pro plan with clear overage rates
- + Active-CPU billing instead of wall-clock billing rewards efficient handlers and makes idle apps free
- + TypeScript-native workflow with Deno's permission-based security model and broad Node/npm compatibility
- + Battle-tested substrate — Netlify edge functions run on the same infrastructure at 255M+ requests/day
Cons
- - Node compatibility is broad but not total — native modules and Node-specific tooling can still break
- - 99.95% SLA and SOC 2 Type 1 are Enterprise-only; Free and Pro have no contractual guarantee
- - The company has announced it is joining Cloudflare, adding platform-roadmap uncertainty
- - Not suited to long-running, connection-heavy or GPU workloads
- - Small-plan limits (one concurrent build on Free, low build-per-hour caps) can pinch teams
Cloudflare
Pros
- + Unmetered bandwidth and requests on every plan, including Free
- + Free managed WAF ruleset, Universal SSL and unmetered DDoS protection by default
- + 330+ city network with Anycast routing and no region pricing
- + Flat per-domain pricing is easy to budget; no egress surprises
- + Terraform provider and full API for configuration as code
Cons
- - No uptime SLA below the Business plan
- - Per-domain billing gets expensive for domain portfolios
- - Advanced WAF tuning and rate limiting are plan-gated
- - Proxy architecture is a concentration risk during network-level incidents
- - Large feature surface means caching misconfigurations can go unnoticed
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.