Skip to content

Deno Deploy vs Appwrite Cloud

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Deno Deploy and Appwrite Cloud.

Quick Verdict

3.9/5

Deno Deploy

0 reviews

3.9/5

Appwrite Cloud

0 reviews

Both Deno Deploy and Appwrite Cloud are equally rated at 3.9/5. Deno Deploy runs JavaScript and TypeScript serverless functions at the edge using the Deno runtime. Near-instant cold starts via V8 isolates, globally distributed across 30+ anycast regions, with Node/npm compatibility. Free for low-traffic apps. Appwrite is an open source BaaS with database, authentication, storage, functions, and messaging. Self-hostable on Docker. Appwrite Cloud provides managed hosting.

Deno Deploy

Deno Deploy

Deno JavaScript runtime at the edge globally

Appwrite Cloud

Appwrite Cloud

Open-source backend platform with built-in database, auth, and APIs

Overview
Rating3.9 (0 reviews)3.9 (0 reviews)
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forTypeScript-first teams shipping globally distributed APIs, SSR apps and webhooks who want zero infrastructure management — and platforms embedding user-run code via Subhosting.Developers and small teams who want a complete managed backend with a genuine self-hosting exit and refuse Firebase-style lock-in.
Features
IPv6✓
DDoS protection
Automated backups✓
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Tags
Tags
free tieropen sourceeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access
free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access
Visit Deno Deploy →Visit Appwrite Cloud →

Deno Deploy

Pros

  • + V8 isolate architecture gives near-instant cold starts, second-scale deploys and automatic global replication
  • + Genuinely usable free tier (1M requests/mo) and an honest $20/mo Pro plan with clear overage rates
  • + Active-CPU billing instead of wall-clock billing rewards efficient handlers and makes idle apps free
  • + TypeScript-native workflow with Deno's permission-based security model and broad Node/npm compatibility
  • + Battle-tested substrate — Netlify edge functions run on the same infrastructure at 255M+ requests/day

Cons

  • - Node compatibility is broad but not total — native modules and Node-specific tooling can still break
  • - 99.95% SLA and SOC 2 Type 1 are Enterprise-only; Free and Pro have no contractual guarantee
  • - The company has announced it is joining Cloudflare, adding platform-roadmap uncertainty
  • - Not suited to long-running, connection-heavy or GPU workloads
  • - Small-plan limits (one concurrent build on Free, low build-per-hour caps) can pinch teams
View full Deno Deployreview →

Appwrite Cloud

Pros

  • + BSD 3-Clause open source with full self-hosting on any Docker host
  • + Generous Pro resources: 2 TB bandwidth, 150 GB storage, 200K MAU at $25/month
  • + Complete backend stack: auth, databases, storage, functions, realtime, messaging
  • + Clear published overage rates and budget caps
  • + Six regions across NA, EU, and APAC

Cons

  • - No published uptime SLA on cloud plans
  • - Free tier pauses projects after a week of inactivity; two-project limit
  • - Per-project pricing multiplies cost for multi-project architectures
  • - Smaller integration ecosystem than Firebase or Supabase
View full Appwrite Cloudreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.