CoreWeave vs Vultr

A detailed comparison to help you choose between CoreWeave and Vultr.

CoreWeave

CoreWeave

Purpose-built cloud for AI and GPU workloads

Vultr

Vultr

32 datacenter locations globally

Overview
Rating3.8 (252 reviews)4.2 (499 reviews)
Pricing modelpaidpaid
Starting priceFrom €200/moFrom €5/mo
Best forAI companies and research organizations needing large-scale GPU compute for model trainingApplications that need specific geographic datacenter locations — especially APAC, Africa, or South America
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores1 vCPU
RAM1 GB
Storage25 GB
Bandwidth1 TB/mo
SLA uptime99.99%
Data-center count32
€/vCPU/mo€5.00
€/GB RAM/mo€5.00
Performance
CPU score (sysbench)4,100
Disk read (fio)1,800 MB/s
Disk IOPS (4K random)38,000
Network out1 Gbps
Latency (TTFB)24 ms
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
United StatesUnited KingdomGermanyNetherlandsFranceAustralia+6
Tags
Tags
hourly billinggpu availableus datacenterapi accesskubernetes support
hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedsnapshotsbare metalgpu availables3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterterraform providerapi accesswindows available
Visit CoreWeave →Visit Vultr →

CoreWeave

Pros

  • + Largest GPU cloud specialized for AI workloads
  • + NVIDIA partnership — direct GPU access
  • + Kubernetes-native architecture

Cons

  • - Enterprise pricing and contracts required
  • - Less accessible for individual developers
View full CoreWeavereview →

Vultr

Pros

  • + 32 global datacenter locations — most in the market
  • + High Frequency NVMe plans are competitively fast
  • + Bare Metal Cloud available on-demand

Cons

  • - Bandwidth overages can get expensive on low-end plans
  • - UI less polished than DigitalOcean
View full Vultrreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.