Skip to content

Convex vs Azure Functions

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Convex and Azure Functions.

Quick Verdict

4.0/5

Convex

0 reviews

4.0/5

Azure Functions

0 reviews

Both Convex and Azure Functions are equally rated at 4.0/5. Convex is a backend-as-a-service that provides a reactive database with real-time subscriptions, serverless functions, file storage, and authentication. TypeScript-first developer experience. Azure Functions is Microsoft's serverless platform. 1M free executions/month. Durable Functions for long-running workflows. Best integration with .NET, Microsoft 365, and Azure services.

Convex

Convex

TypeScript-first backend platform with real-time sync and serverless functions

Azure Functions

Azure Functions

Microsoft serverless functions for .NET teams

Overview
Rating4.0 (0 reviews)4.0 (0 reviews)
Pricing modelfreemiumusage-based
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forTypeScript teams building real-time, collaborative or AI-agent applications who want to replace an assembled backend stack with one reactive platform and value developer velocity over infrastructure control.Microsoft/.NET teams building event-driven processing, workflows (Durable Functions), and spiky APIs inside the Azure ecosystem
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores——
RAM——
Storage1 GB—
Bandwidth——
SLA uptime——
Data-center count3—
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection✓
Automated backups✓
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
US East (N. Virginia), EU West, Canada Central
—
Tags
Tags
free tierapi access
free tierapi accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter
Visit Convex →Visit Azure Functions →

Convex

Pros

  • + Replaces a whole backend stack — database, functions, sync, search, storage and auth — with end-to-end TypeScript type safety and ACID transactions
  • + Generous economics for reactive apps: query/mutation compute free on serverless, plus a real free plan and pay-as-you-go Starter tier
  • + All unit rates and per-tier limits published, including an honest 1.3x regional multiplier for EU and Canada
  • + Core backend open-sourced (March 2024) with self-hosting option — genuine lock-in relief uncommon in this category
  • + Well-funded ($110.5M through a $57M Series B in 2026), SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA compliant, with named production customers at real scale

Cons

  • - Document model is not SQL — poor fit for Postgres estates, analyst workflows and BI tooling
  • - Usage-based metering can surprise chatty clients; no hard spend caps on paid tiers
  • - Support SLAs are a paid feature: 30-minute P1 response only in $1,000–$2,000/month premier tiers
  • - TypeScript-first to the point of exclusion — a non-starter for non-TS teams
  • - Self-hosting the open-source backend is an operational project most teams will only use as an escape hatch
View full Convexreview →

Azure Functions

Pros

  • + Permanent free grant of 1 million executions and 400,000 GB-s per month
  • + Trigger/binding integrations cover most Azure and third-party services declaratively
  • + Durable Functions for stateful orchestration — the strongest workflow story among serverless platforms
  • + Hosting plan ladder (Consumption, Flex, Premium, Dedicated, Container Apps) covers most cost/performance points
  • + 99.95% SLA with service credits scaling up to 100% below 95% uptime

Cons

  • - Cold starts on Consumption hurt latency-sensitive HTTP workloads
  • - Per-instance limits (1.5 GB RAM, 1 core) cap what single functions can do
  • - Azure surface area: storage account, monitoring, identity, and networking costs stack up
  • - Bindings and Durable Functions abstractions lock integration logic to Azure
  • - Premium costs real money whether or not traffic flows (EP1 ~$146/month US rates)
View full Azure Functionsreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.