Skip to content

Convex vs AWS Lambda

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Convex and AWS Lambda.

Quick Verdict

4.0/5

Convex

0 reviews

4.1/5

AWS Lambda

0 reviews

AWS Lambda is rated higher (4.1 vs 4.0). Convex is a backend-as-a-service that provides a reactive database with real-time subscriptions, serverless functions, file storage, and authentication. TypeScript-first developer experience. AWS Lambda is the original FaaS service — run code without servers. Supports 15+ runtimes, 1M free requests/month, and integrates deeply with 200+ AWS services. Triggered by S3, DynamoDB, API Gateway, and more.

Convex

Convex

TypeScript-first backend platform with real-time sync and serverless functions

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda

The original serverless functions service

Overview
Rating4.0 (0 reviews)4.1 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium (pay per request + GB-second; MicroVMs/Managed Instances metered differently)
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forTypeScript teams building real-time, collaborative or AI-agent applications who want to replace an assembled backend stack with one reactive platform and value developer velocity over infrastructure control.AWS developers building event-driven, variable-traffic workloads — webhooks, media processing, scheduled jobs, API backends — who want to stop managing servers entirely
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores——
RAM——
Storage1 GB—
Bandwidth——
SLA uptime—99.95%
Data-center count3—
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection✓
Automated backups✓
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing✓
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
US East (N. Virginia), EU West, Canada Central
All 39 AWS regions / 124 AZs
Tags
Tags
free tierapi access
free tierapi accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter
Visit Convex →Visit AWS Lambda →

Convex

Pros

  • + Replaces a whole backend stack — database, functions, sync, search, storage and auth — with end-to-end TypeScript type safety and ACID transactions
  • + Generous economics for reactive apps: query/mutation compute free on serverless, plus a real free plan and pay-as-you-go Starter tier
  • + All unit rates and per-tier limits published, including an honest 1.3x regional multiplier for EU and Canada
  • + Core backend open-sourced (March 2024) with self-hosting option — genuine lock-in relief uncommon in this category
  • + Well-funded ($110.5M through a $57M Series B in 2026), SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA compliant, with named production customers at real scale

Cons

  • - Document model is not SQL — poor fit for Postgres estates, analyst workflows and BI tooling
  • - Usage-based metering can surprise chatty clients; no hard spend caps on paid tiers
  • - Support SLAs are a paid feature: 30-minute P1 response only in $1,000–$2,000/month premier tiers
  • - TypeScript-first to the point of exclusion — a non-starter for non-TS teams
  • - Self-hosting the open-source backend is an operational project most teams will only use as an escape hatch
View full Convexreview →

AWS Lambda

Pros

  • + Zero idle cost with a free tier that covers small products: 1M requests and 400,000 GB-seconds monthly
  • + Graviton pricing at $0.0000133334 per GB-second undercuts x86 by roughly 20%
  • + Automatic multi-AZ scaling with a 99.95% per-region SLA and no capacity planning
  • + Deep event integration across AWS services, with three form factors (Event/Web Functions, MicroVMs)

Cons

  • - Per-request and GB-second pricing gets expensive against committed compute at steady high utilization
  • - Cold starts — hundreds of milliseconds to seconds depending on runtime — with provisioned concurrency as an extra meter
  • - 15-minute execution limit and payload caps make it wrong for long-running batch work
  • - AWS-specific event plumbing creates real lock-in; distributed event chains are hard to debug
View full AWS Lambdareview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.