Convesio vs Infomaniak
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Convesio and Infomaniak.
Quick Verdict
3.5/5
Convesio
0 reviews
3.8/5
Infomaniak
0 reviews
Infomaniak is rated higher (3.8 vs 3.5). Convesio runs WordPress on Docker containers that auto-scale based on traffic. No single point of failure. Used by news sites that experience traffic spikes. Auto-healing infrastructure. Swiss hosting company running 100% renewable energy with strict no-GAFAM policy. VPS, managed WordPress, and email hosting. B Corp certified. Very popular in French-speaking Switzerland and France.
Convesio Scalable WordPress on container clusters | Infomaniak Swiss ethical cloud running on renewable energy | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.5 (0 reviews) | 3.8 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $50/mo | From $2.7/mo✓ |
| Best for | WooCommerce stores, publishers, membership and LMS sites with spiky traffic where downtime costs real revenue, and agencies wanting managed WordPress with per-site economics and hands-on support. | Eco-conscious European and Swiss businesses wanting data sovereignty, renewable-powered infrastructure, and honest unmetered VPS pricing |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 2 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 1 GB | — |
| Storage | 5 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | 99.99% | — |
| Data-center count | 4 | — |
| €/vCPU/mo | €25.00 | — |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €50.00 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | Los Angeles, Ashburn (US), Amsterdam, Zurich (EU) | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | managed optionbackups includedus datacentereu datacenter | nvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedeu datacentergdpr compliant |
| Visit Convesio → | Visit Infomaniak → | |
Convesio
Pros
- + Auto-scaling Docker containers with self-healing and a custom load balancer — built for traffic spikes without manual intervention
- + Real contractual SLA: 99.99% availability with 5% service credit per hour of downtime, plus real-time data center failover
- + Per-CPU pricing instead of metered visits — billing tracks resource use, not a traffic estimate
- + Managed layer includes white-glove migrations, daily and hourly database backups, DDoS protection, CDN, SSL and staging
- + 24/7 support with priority Slack and event-day standby; HIPAA tier available for regulated WordPress deployments
Cons
- - Premium pricing: entry at $50/month per site buys modest resources — overkill for low-traffic sites
- - Multiple overlapping plan generations and an itemized add-on list make the real invoice hard to predict
- - Proprietary stack (custom load balancer/caching) means lock-in; migration out means rebuilding elsewhere
- - Marketing quotes 99.999% uptime while the contractual SLA is 99.99% — a gap worth knowing about
- - WordPress-only value proposition; useless for non-WordPress workloads or teams wanting server-level control
Infomaniak
Pros
- + Genuine Swiss data sovereignty — data hosted exclusively in Switzerland under Swiss law
- + Very competitive pricing with unmetered traffic on every VPS plan
- + Uniformly modern hardware: AMD EPYC on Dell servers with NVMe storage across tiers
- + TIER III+ own data centers, ISO 27001/9001/14001 certified, n+1 redundancy
- + Employee-majority-owned, B Corp certified, renewable-powered with verifiable environmental commitments
Cons
- - Swiss-only data centers mean higher latency for non-European audiences
- - No published uptime SLA for the standard VPS Lite and VPS Cloud lines
- - VPS Lite requires annual prepayment at the budget tiers
- - French-first documentation and support; European-hours orientation
- - Smaller ecosystem (images, tutorials, community) than the big developer hosts
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.