Skip to content

CockroachDB vs Turso

A detailed comparison to help you choose between CockroachDB and Turso.

Quick Verdict

4.2/5

CockroachDB

0 reviews

4.1/5

Turso

0 reviews

CockroachDB is rated higher (4.2 vs 4.1). CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built to survive datacenter failures. Postgres-compatible, strong consistency, and automatic scaling across regions. Managed plans: Basic (usage-based, free tier), Standard and Advanced (provisioned), plus BYOC and the new Cockroach Continuum editions. Turso offers SQLite-based databases at the edge for multi-tenant SaaS. Create thousands of database instances, each at a different edge location. Per-tenant isolation at SQLite pricing.

CockroachDB

CockroachDB

Distributed SQL database that survives failures

Turso

Turso

Edge SQLite — create thousands of DB instances

Overview
Rating4.2 (0 reviews)✓4.1 (0 reviews)
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forApplications where the database must survive region loss without losing transactions — payments, ledgers, identity, multi-region SaaS, global gaming backends — and teams ready for distributed-SQL trade-offsMulti-tenant SaaS and AI agent workloads needing per-tenant SQLite databases replicated close to users
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores2 vCPU—
RAM——
Storage—5 GB
Bandwidth——
SLA uptime99.99%—
Data-center count—30
€/vCPU/mo€0.00—
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing✓
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
AWS, GCP and Azure regions across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific (multi-region clusters)
—
Tags
Tags
free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access
free tierapi accessopen source
Visit CockroachDB →Visit Turso →

CockroachDB

Pros

  • + True multi-region survivability with serializable transactions and Postgres wire compatibility
  • + Generous free tier: Basic at $0/month with 50M RUs and 10 GiB free monthly, $400 trial credits, no card required
  • + Contractual SLAs: 99.99% availability, up to 99.999% multi-region on Advanced; P1 response targets published
  • + Transparent per-component cost documentation and a public pricing calculator
  • + Enterprise compliance path (CMEK, PCI DSS, HIPAA) and AWS/GCP/Azure coverage

Cons

  • - Production costs climb fast: storage billed at 4.5x durability multiplier, plus backups, CDC and egress
  • - September 2026 plan restructure (Cockroach Continuum) splits new and existing customers onto different rate cards
  • - Distributed-SQL learning curve: RU model, planner differences from vanilla Postgres, cross-region latency
  • - Overkill for single-region applications — managed Postgres is far cheaper for the same job
  • - Proprietary managed plane; open-core self-hosting shifts the operational burden back to you
View full CockroachDBreview →

Turso

Pros

  • + True per-tenant database isolation at SQLite pricing — 100 databases free, unlimited from $5.99/mo
  • + Published pricing, overage rates, and even per-tier commit latency — rare transparency
  • + Edge replication across 30+ locations with placement you control per database
  • + Eleven-nines durability via S3-backed commits; MIT-licensed engine you can self-host
  • + SQLite file-format and SQL compatibility keeps local dev and production aligned

Cons

  • - No public uptime SLA on self-serve plans — the guarantee is durability, not availability
  • - Rows-read metering punishes unindexed queries; costs can surprise the careless
  • - EU databases still back up to S3 us-east-2 unless you bring your own buckets (Pro+)
  • - SQLite dialect limits rule out query-heavy relational workloads
  • - Big price jump from Scaler ($29/mo) to Pro ($499/mo) for priority support and compliance
View full Tursoreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.