CockroachDB vs SingleStore
A detailed comparison to help you choose between CockroachDB and SingleStore.
Quick Verdict
4.4/5
CockroachDB
357 reviews
3.8/5
SingleStore
348 reviews
CockroachDB is rated higher (4.4 vs 3.8). CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built to survive datacenter failures. Postgres-compatible, strong consistency, and automatic scaling across regions. Serverless and dedicated options. SingleStore (formerly MemSQL) is a cloud-native database combining OLTP and OLAP in a single system. Handles real-time analytics and transactions without ETL. Used by financial services and gaming companies.
CockroachDB Distributed SQL database that survives failures | SingleStore Real-time analytics and transactions in one database | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.4 (357 reviews)✓ | 3.8 (348 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Applications requiring high availability across multiple regions where database availability is mission-critical | Financial services, gaming, and analytics companies needing real-time queries across both transactions and analytics |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tiermanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapi access |
| Visit CockroachDB → | Visit SingleStore → | |
CockroachDB
Pros
- + Survives datacenter failures by design
- + Postgres-compatible SQL
- + Automatic geographic distribution
Cons
- - More complex than standard Postgres
- - Free tier limits apply
SingleStore
Pros
- + HTAP — handles both transactions and analytics
- + Real-time query performance
- + Free shared tier available
Cons
- - Not suitable for simple CRUD apps
- - Complex pricing at scale
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.