CockroachDB vs Neon
A detailed comparison to help you choose between CockroachDB and Neon.
CockroachDB Distributed SQL database that survives failures | Neon Serverless Postgres with branching and scale-to-zero | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.4 (357 reviews) | 4.6 (305 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Applications requiring high availability across multiple regions where database availability is mission-critical | Developers using Next.js or serverless frameworks who want Postgres with branching at zero idle cost |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 0 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 0 GB |
| Storage | — | 0 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 0 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.9% |
| Data-center count | — | 8 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | United StatesEuropean Union |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapi accessopen source |
| Visit CockroachDB → | Visit Neon → | |
CockroachDB
Pros
- + Survives datacenter failures by design
- + Postgres-compatible SQL
- + Automatic geographic distribution
Cons
- - More complex than standard Postgres
- - Free tier limits apply
Neon
Pros
- + Scale-to-zero — no charges for idle databases
- + Database branching for preview environments
- + Generous free tier — 10 projects
Cons
- - Cold start latency when scaled to zero
- - Less mature than managed RDS for mission-critical
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.