cloudno.de vs Shuttle
A detailed comparison to help you choose between cloudno.de and Shuttle.
Quick Verdict
3.0/5
cloudno.de
0 reviews
3.4/5
Shuttle
0 reviews
Shuttle is rated higher (3.4 vs 3.0). German managed PaaS for Node.js apps: Git-push deploys, CouchDB/MongoDB/Redis data layer, S3-compatible object storage and Parse Server mobile backends, from Microlog GmbH. Shuttle deploys Rust backend services with zero configuration — annotate your code with macros and Shuttle handles the infrastructure. No YAML, no Terraform. Pay-per-use serverless Rust.
cloudno.de Deploy Node.js apps with minimal infrastructure overhead | Shuttle Deploy Rust backends from your code — no config | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.0 (0 reviews) | 3.4 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Individual developers and small teams running low-traffic Node.js apps, bots and Parse-based mobile backends who want a cheap European PaaS | Rust developers — solo or small teams — who want a backend live in minutes from annotated code and can accept a London-only region and no contractual uptime guarantee. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 0 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 1 GB |
| Storage | — | 1 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | 99.5% | — |
| Data-center count | — | 1 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €0.00 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | AWS eu-west-2 (London) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiereu datacentergdpr compliant | free tieropen sourceus datacenter |
| Visit cloudno.de → | Visit Shuttle → | |
cloudno.de
Pros
- + Very low entry price — Plus at €2/month (billed per year) for 3 apps
- + Real data layer: CouchDB, MongoDB, Redis and S3-compatible object storage included
- + Free plan exists as a starting point with an upgrade path on the same platform
- + German company under German law; 99.5% availability commitment published in the terms
- + Git-push workflow, WebSockets, custom domains and SSL handled at the platform level
Cons
- - No published infrastructure, data-center locations or per-plan resource specs
- - Terms of service dated 2013; public activity and third-party coverage thin in recent years
- - 99.5% availability commitment is below modern market standard, with documented traffic sharing under load
- - PayPal-only billing; email and Slack support, no enterprise tier
- - 'Medium' and 'large' app sizes undefined; free-tier and Ultimate-tier limits unpublished
Shuttle
Pros
- + Infrastructure from code annotations: databases, secrets and static assets provisioned from function signatures, no YAML or Terraform
- + Real free tier (0.25 vCPU, 0.5 GB RAM, 0.5 GB database, 100 build minutes/month) with custom domain support
- + Published, itemized usage rates ($0.12/GB storage, $0.025/build minute, $0.10/GB egress) instead of sales-quoted pricing
- + Clear isolation tiering: spot instances on free, reserved VM-isolated instances from Pro
- + First-class Rust framework support (Axum, Actix Web, Rocket, Serenity) and open-source platform code
Cons
- - Rust only — other language stacks are not supported today
- - Single AWS region (London, eu-west-2) with no region choice below the not-yet-available Enterprise tier
- - No published uptime SLA on any current tier; support is Discord-based with 1-business-day response on Pro
- - Steep jump from $20/mo Pro to $250/mo Growth, with metered usage on top of every paid tier
- - Tier contents have changed materially over time (projects and included egress were cut in 2025)
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.