CloudJiffy vs LucidLink
A detailed comparison to help you choose between CloudJiffy and LucidLink.
Quick Verdict
3.2/5
CloudJiffy
0 reviews
4.0/5
LucidLink
0 reviews
LucidLink is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.2). CloudJiffy is a PaaS provider offering automatic vertical and horizontal scaling for Java, Node.js, PHP, Ruby, and Docker. EU datacenters with pay-per-use billing per resource consumed. LucidLink turns S3 object storage into a shared, streaming cloud filesystem for teams working with large files.
CloudJiffy PaaS with auto-scaling containers in EU | LucidLink Cloud file streaming for teams: a shared filesystem on top of S3 object storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.2 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $0.83/mo✓ | From $7/mo |
| Best for | Teams wanting managed PaaS with EU or Indian data residency and traffic-driven autoscaling — agencies, spiky SaaS prototypes, Java/PHP stacks — who accept Virtuozzo tooling | Creative and production teams (video, audio, VFX, design) with large shared files and distributed members who need one live filesystem without syncing or shipping drives. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | — |
| RAM | 0.1 GB | — |
| Storage | 20 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | — |
| Data-center count | 3 | — |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €8.30 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | Pune, India; Frankfurt, Germany; Los Angeles, USA | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged optioneu datacenterapi access | — |
| Visit CloudJiffy → | ||
CloudJiffy
Pros
- + Pay-per-use cloudlet billing — reserved cloudlets from $0.001143/hour with volume discounts
- + Free backups with free restores and no storage limits, plus 20 GB free disk per environment
- + Fully managed platform: patching, container isolation, wiring and scaling handled for you
- + Three regions including Frankfurt (EU) and Pune (India) for data residency
- + Auto vertical and horizontal scaling driven by real traffic, not declared server size
Cons
- - No numeric uptime SLA or public incident history published
- - Virtuozzo/Jelastic ecosystem: thin third-party docs and real platform lock-in
- - Small company (Leapswitch Networks, Pune) behind a niche platform
- - Public marketing pages contain unedited template placeholder content
- - No permanent free tier — 14-day trial with significant feature limits
LucidLink
Pros
- + Streams large shared files on demand — no full downloads before work starts
- + Zero-knowledge encryption: the vendor cannot read customer content
- + Transparent published per-member pricing with included storage per seat
- + Built on S3, with bring-your-own-S3 on Enterprise for storage-substrate flexibility
- + 30-day free trial without a credit card; desktop, mobile and web clients
- + TeamCache add-on brings cloud files to on-prem users at LAN speed
Cons
- - Storage overage of $7-8 per 100 GB is roughly $70-80 per TB per month — far above raw S3
- - Starter tier is tightly capped: 10 members, 1 filespace, 1 TB, and no snapshot recovery
- - Specialized for file-streaming workloads; wrong shape for databases or block storage
- - No published region list or public uptime SLA outside Enterprise discussions
- - Client and control-plane dependency on a mid-size specialist vendor
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.