Skip to content

Cloudflare Workers vs Convex

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Cloudflare Workers and Convex.

Quick Verdict

4.3/5

Cloudflare Workers

0 reviews

4.0/5

Convex

0 reviews

Cloudflare Workers is rated higher (4.3 vs 4.0). Run JavaScript, Python, and Rust functions at the edge with sub-millisecond latency. Ideal for APIs, middleware, and full-stack applications needing global distribution. Convex is a backend-as-a-service that provides a reactive database with real-time subscriptions, serverless functions, file storage, and authentication. TypeScript-first developer experience.

Cloudflare Workers

Cloudflare Workers

Deploy serverless code globally on Cloudflare's edge network

Convex

Convex

TypeScript-first backend platform with real-time sync and serverless functions

Overview
Rating4.3 (0 reviews)✓4.0 (0 reviews)
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forLatency-sensitive APIs, middleware, edge rendering and full-stack applications that want global deployment with no infrastructure to run — especially teams already using Cloudflare's storage and CDN products.TypeScript teams building real-time, collaborative or AI-agent applications who want to replace an assembled backend stack with one reactive platform and value developer velocity over infrastructure control.
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores10 vCPU—
RAM——
Storage1 GB1 GB
Bandwidth——
SLA uptime100%—
Data-center count330✓3
€/vCPU/mo€0.00—
Features
IPv6✓
DDoS protection✓
Automated backups✓
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
Global — 300+ cities
US East (N. Virginia), EU West, Canada Central
Tags
Tags
free tierddos protectionipv6eu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessopen source
free tierapi access
Visit Cloudflare Workers →Visit Convex →

Cloudflare Workers

Pros

  • + No cold starts: V8 isolates start in microseconds at 330+ locations
  • + CPU-time billing with a genuinely usable free tier (100k requests/day)
  • + No egress or bandwidth charges on any plan
  • + Storage stack (KV, D1, Durable Objects, R2) binds declaratively and stays in-network
  • + Strong docs: pricing and limits pages are explicit and example-driven

Cons

  • - CPU time caps exclude compute-heavy and long-running workloads
  • - Real vendor lock-in through Durable Objects, bindings and deployment model
  • - KV writes ($5.00/M) and Durable Objects duration billing surprise stateful designs
  • - Conceptual shift for teams used to container-based serverless
  • - No uptime SLA below the Business plan
View full Cloudflare Workersreview →

Convex

Pros

  • + Replaces a whole backend stack — database, functions, sync, search, storage and auth — with end-to-end TypeScript type safety and ACID transactions
  • + Generous economics for reactive apps: query/mutation compute free on serverless, plus a real free plan and pay-as-you-go Starter tier
  • + All unit rates and per-tier limits published, including an honest 1.3x regional multiplier for EU and Canada
  • + Core backend open-sourced (March 2024) with self-hosting option — genuine lock-in relief uncommon in this category
  • + Well-funded ($110.5M through a $57M Series B in 2026), SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA compliant, with named production customers at real scale

Cons

  • - Document model is not SQL — poor fit for Postgres estates, analyst workflows and BI tooling
  • - Usage-based metering can surprise chatty clients; no hard spend caps on paid tiers
  • - Support SLAs are a paid feature: 30-minute P1 response only in $1,000–$2,000/month premier tiers
  • - TypeScript-first to the point of exclusion — a non-starter for non-TS teams
  • - Self-hosting the open-source backend is an operational project most teams will only use as an escape hatch
View full Convexreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.