Cloudflare WAF vs Gcore
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Cloudflare WAF and Gcore.
Cloudflare WAF Web Application Firewall protecting millions of sites | Gcore Global CDN with 150+ PoPs including Russia and CIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.5 (249 reviews) | 4.8 (275 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Every website — Cloudflare WAF is the standard baseline for web application firewall protection | Applications needing CDN coverage in CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa beyond Cloudflare's footprint |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierddos protectionapi accesseu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Cloudflare WAF → | Visit Gcore → | |
Cloudflare WAF
Pros
- + Free WAF rules on all plans
- + DDoS mitigation up to 142Tbps
- + 300+ PoP global network absorbs attacks
Cons
- - Advanced WAF rules require Pro+ plan
- - Some legitimate traffic can be blocked
Gcore
Pros
- + Strong CIS, Russia, Middle East coverage
- + 150+ PoPs
- + Free CDN tier available
Cons
- - Luxembourg HQ but some CIS/Russia coverage raises questions
- - Less known brand in Western markets
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.