Cloudflare R2 vs Sirv
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Cloudflare R2 and Sirv.
Quick Verdict
4.4/5
Cloudflare R2
0 reviews
3.4/5
Sirv
0 reviews
Cloudflare R2 is rated higher (4.4 vs 3.4). Cloudflare R2 is S3-compatible object storage with zero egress fees — ever. $0.015/GB/month storage, no data transfer costs. Tightly integrated with Cloudflare Workers and CDN. Sirv delivers images and videos globally with automatic format conversion, responsive sizing, and interactive features. Built for e-commerce, media, and content-heavy sites needing fast load times.
Cloudflare R2 Zero egress S3 storage on Cloudflare's network | Sirv Image and video CDN with smart optimization built in | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.4 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.4 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium (free tier plus usage-based pricing) | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Teams serving media, assets, downloads or backups where egress dominates their current object storage bill — especially those already building on Workers or Pages. | E-commerce and product-media teams that need zoomable, spinable, responsively delivered product imagery — especially on Shopify, WooCommerce, Magento or Drupal — without building their own image-processing stack. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | Global — Cloudflare network | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiers3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tierapi access |
| Visit Cloudflare R2 → | Visit Sirv → | |
Cloudflare R2
Pros
- + Zero egress fees on all storage classes — no data transfer bill at all
- + Standing free tier: 10 GB-month storage, 1M Class A and 10M Class B ops monthly
- + S3-compatible API works with existing SDKs and migration tooling
- + Published durability (11 nines) and a 99.9% monthly uptime SLA with credits
- + Binds directly to Workers, Pages and public buckets with no cross-product egress
Cons
- - S3 feature surface is thinner — no replication topology, simpler lifecycle tooling
- - Class A operations at $4.50/million make write-heavy workloads pricier than storage-only math
- - Infrequent Access has a 30-day minimum storage duration and retrieval fees
- - Real lock-in sits in Workers-based processing around buckets, not the storage itself
- - Not suited to analytics-style scans or small-object high-churn data
Sirv
Pros
- + On-the-fly image transformation from URL parameters — no build-time processing pipeline to maintain
- + 360° spin and deep zoom are first-class, not add-ons, which is what product photography actually needs
- + Generous free tier with S3 and FTP access, so originals stay portable
- + Soft limits instead of hard cutoffs — a traffic spike does not break the site
- + Long track record (since 2007) and a 99.999% SLA on Enterprise
Cons
- - 20 GB transfer on the $19 Business plan is thin for media-heavy stores; scale pricing needs a custom conversation
- - No published uptime commitment below Enterprise — failover and off-site replication are $999/month features
- - Video delivery is a secondary feature, not competitive with dedicated video platforms
- - Small vendor (roughly a dozen staff, unfunded) — weigh continuity risk and keep originals exported
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.