Cloudflare R2 vs Gcore
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Cloudflare R2 and Gcore.
Cloudflare R2 Zero egress S3 storage on Cloudflare's network | Gcore Global CDN with 150+ PoPs including Russia and CIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 5.0 (203 reviews)✓ | 4.8 (275 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Applications serving large amounts of user-generated content or assets where egress costs are a major expense | Applications needing CDN coverage in CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa beyond Cloudflare's footprint |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 0 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 0 GB | — |
| Storage | 0 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | 0 TB/mo | — |
| SLA uptime | 99.9% | — |
| Data-center count | 300 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | Global — Cloudflare network | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiers3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Cloudflare R2 → | Visit Gcore → | |
Cloudflare R2
Pros
- + Zero egress fees — massive saving for high-traffic assets
- + S3-compatible API
- + 10GB free per month forever
Cons
- - Cloudflare ecosystem lock-in
- - Not ideal for pure backup storage without lifecycle policies
Gcore
Pros
- + Strong CIS, Russia, Middle East coverage
- + 150+ PoPs
- + Free CDN tier available
Cons
- - Luxembourg HQ but some CIS/Russia coverage raises questions
- - Less known brand in Western markets
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.