Cloudflare R2 vs Cloudflare Pages
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Cloudflare R2 and Cloudflare Pages.
Quick Verdict
4.4/5
Cloudflare R2
0 reviews
4.3/5
Cloudflare Pages
0 reviews
Cloudflare R2 is rated higher (4.4 vs 4.3). Cloudflare R2 is S3-compatible object storage with zero egress fees — ever. $0.015/GB/month storage, no data transfer costs. Tightly integrated with Cloudflare Workers and CDN. Cloudflare Pages is a JAMstack platform for deploying websites directly from Git repositories. Built-in CI/CD, global CDN, and serverless functions for developers and teams of any size.
Cloudflare R2 Zero egress S3 storage on Cloudflare's network | Cloudflare Pages Deploy static and dynamic sites with zero configuration | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.4 (0 reviews)✓ | 4.3 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium (free tier plus usage-based pricing) | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Teams serving media, assets, downloads or backups where egress dominates their current object storage bill — especially those already building on Workers or Pages. | Front-end teams, docs and marketing sites, and JAMstack projects that want global delivery and git-based deploys with no servers to run — especially those already inside the Cloudflare ecosystem. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | Global — Cloudflare network | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiers3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tiereu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Cloudflare R2 → | Visit Cloudflare Pages → | |
Cloudflare R2
Pros
- + Zero egress fees on all storage classes — no data transfer bill at all
- + Standing free tier: 10 GB-month storage, 1M Class A and 10M Class B ops monthly
- + S3-compatible API works with existing SDKs and migration tooling
- + Published durability (11 nines) and a 99.9% monthly uptime SLA with credits
- + Binds directly to Workers, Pages and public buckets with no cross-product egress
Cons
- - S3 feature surface is thinner — no replication topology, simpler lifecycle tooling
- - Class A operations at $4.50/million make write-heavy workloads pricier than storage-only math
- - Infrequent Access has a 30-day minimum storage duration and retrieval fees
- - Real lock-in sits in Workers-based processing around buckets, not the storage itself
- - Not suited to analytics-style scans or small-object high-churn data
Cloudflare Pages
Pros
- + Unlimited sites, seats, requests and bandwidth even on the free tier
- + Preview deployment for every commit, unlimited previews on all plans
- + Pages Functions run on the Workers runtime with KV, D1, Durable Objects and R2 bindings
- + Builds and TLS are fully managed; zero server configuration
- + Flat plan pricing — delivery volume never changes the bill
Cons
- - Build limits (500/month Free) bind long before bandwidth does
- - 20,000-file and 25 MiB per-file ceilings push media-heavy sites to R2
- - Hard platform boundary: no persistent servers, no arbitrary runtimes
- - Shared build infrastructure can queue during peak periods
- - No uptime SLA below the Business plan
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.