Civo vs OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Civo and OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Civo
0 reviews
3.9/5
OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes
0 reviews
Civo is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.9). Civo offers managed Kubernetes using K3s (lightweight Kubernetes) that deploys in 90 seconds. Developer-first with a clean UI and marketplace of one-click apps. US, EU, and APAC locations. managed K8s clusters in all OVHcloud Public Cloud regions (Europe, North America, Asia-Pacific)
Civo K3s Kubernetes in 90 seconds — developer-first | OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes EU managed Kubernetes from OVH at low cost | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.9 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | freemium |
| Starting price | From $5.43/mo | Free tier available✓ |
| Best for | Kubernetes-first teams with real egress costs who want a free control plane, honest pricing, and UK/EU/India regions | EU-focused teams that want managed Kubernetes economics without control-plane fees and are comfortable driving clusters through Terraform and kubectl. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 1 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 1 GB | — |
| Storage | 30 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | 99.95%✓ | 99.5% |
| Data-center count | 4 | — |
| €/vCPU/mo | €5.43 | — |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €5.43 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | London UK, Frankfurt DE, New York US, Mumbai IN | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | managed optionhourly billingeu datacentergdpr compliantapi access |
| Visit Civo → | Visit OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes → | |
Civo
Pros
- + Free, highly available control plane (99.95% SLA) — no per-cluster fee like EKS/GKE
- + Free unlimited data transfer on every plan removes the most common cloud bill surprise
- + CNCF-conformant Kubernetes with ~90-second cluster launches and simple node scaling
- + Refreshingly readable pricing: entry worker node $5.43/mo, hourly billing, no commitments
- + S3-compatible object stores, managed databases, Terraform/CLI/API, docs maintained in public on GitHub
Cons
- - Only four documented public regions (London, Frankfurt, New York, Mumbai) — thin for global audiences
- - GPU capacity is London-only, and the product range stops short of serverless and managed Redis
- - No DDoS mitigation policy or instance IPv6 documented on Civo's own pages — a transparency gap
- - Instance snapshots are documented for CivoStack Enterprise private regions, not the public cloud
- - Small provider: support relies on a small team plus community Slack, and K3s-derived design has edges at scale
OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes
Pros
- + Permanently free managed control plane on the Free plan (up to 100 nodes)
- + Standard plan adds dedicated multi-AZ control plane for $0.099/hour per cluster
- + Official Terraform/Pulumi support, autoscaling, OIDC, vRack private networking
- + EU data residency with regions in France, Germany, UK and Poland
- + $200 Public Cloud trial credit covers roughly a month of real worker nodes
Cons
- - Free plan SLA is 99.5% with no service credits; Standard 99.99% promised only after beta
- - Control panel is dense and less polished than GKE or DigitalOcean
- - Ticket-based support on standard tiers; no multi-cluster management in-product
- - etcd quota (400 MiB free / 8 GiB standard) limits CRD-heavy operator usage
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.