Civo vs Amazon EKS
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Civo and Amazon EKS.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Civo
0 reviews
3.9/5
Amazon EKS
0 reviews
Civo is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.9). Civo offers managed Kubernetes using K3s (lightweight Kubernetes) that deploys in 90 seconds. Developer-first with a clean UI and marketplace of one-click apps. US, EU, and APAC locations. Managed Kubernetes service that handles cluster operations, patching, and scaling. For teams running containerized workloads who want to reduce Kubernetes infrastructure overhead.
Civo K3s Kubernetes in 90 seconds — developer-first |  Amazon EKS AWS-managed Kubernetes with automatic control plane patching and scaling | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.9 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $5.43/mo✓ | From $73/mo |
| Best for | Kubernetes-first teams with real egress costs who want a free control plane, honest pricing, and UK/EU/India regions | Organizations already committed to AWS who need production Kubernetes without managing the control plane infrastructure |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 1 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 1 GB | — |
| Storage | 30 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | 99.95% | 99.95% |
| Data-center count | 4 | 39✓ |
| €/vCPU/mo | €5.43 | — |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €5.43 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | London UK, Frankfurt DE, New York US, Mumbai IN | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | managed optionapi accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenterterraform provider |
| Visit Civo → | Visit Amazon EKS → | |
Civo
Pros
- + Free, highly available control plane (99.95% SLA) — no per-cluster fee like EKS/GKE
- + Free unlimited data transfer on every plan removes the most common cloud bill surprise
- + CNCF-conformant Kubernetes with ~90-second cluster launches and simple node scaling
- + Refreshingly readable pricing: entry worker node $5.43/mo, hourly billing, no commitments
- + S3-compatible object stores, managed databases, Terraform/CLI/API, docs maintained in public on GitHub
Cons
- - Only four documented public regions (London, Frankfurt, New York, Mumbai) — thin for global audiences
- - GPU capacity is London-only, and the product range stops short of serverless and managed Redis
- - No DDoS mitigation policy or instance IPv6 documented on Civo's own pages — a transparency gap
- - Instance snapshots are documented for CivoStack Enterprise private regions, not the public cloud
- - Small provider: support relies on a small team plus community Slack, and K3s-derived design has edges at scale
Amazon EKS
Pros
- + AWS-managed control plane across three AZs: no etcd, API server or upgrade operations
- + Upstream-conformant Kubernetes — standard manifests, operators and CNCF tooling work unchanged
- + Public, simple cluster fee ($0.10/hour) with no per-seat charges and no overage premiums on usage
- + Choice of EC2 managed node groups (including GPU and Graviton), Fargate serverless pods or Auto Mode
- + Deep AWS integration: IAM auth, VPC networking, EBS/ECR, Shield Standard DDoS protection, 39 regions
Cons
- - Extended support jumps to $0.60/hour per cluster after 14 months if versions are not upgraded
- - Total cost dominated by compute, storage and inter-AZ data transfer; bills are hard to forecast
- - Real AWS coupling through IAM, CSI drivers and ingress controllers despite Kubernetes conformance
- - Human support requires paid AWS Support plans on top of the platform costs
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.