Cherry Servers vs Latitude.sh
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Cherry Servers and Latitude.sh.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Cherry Servers
0 reviews
3.8/5
Latitude.sh
0 reviews
Cherry Servers is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.8). Lithuanian provider of bare-metal dedicated servers and cloud VPS in Europe, the US and Singapore, with hourly or monthly billing. Cloud VPS from about $3.24 per month. Latitude.sh provides on-demand bare metal cloud in underserved markets: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and also US, EU, and Asia. Sub-5-minute deployment, API-first, and Kubernetes support.
Cherry Servers Bare-metal & cloud servers | Latitude.sh Bare metal cloud in Latin America and worldwide | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.8 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | usage-based |
| Starting price | From $3.24/mo✓ | From $69/mo |
| Best for | Developers and teams needing customizable bare-metal and cloud VPS with hourly billing, generous egress, and EU data residency | Teams needing dedicated hardware with automated deployment in specific cities — especially Latin America — for latency-sensitive or AI workloads, with their own ops function. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 12 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 32 GB |
| Storage | — | 800 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 20 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | 99.97%✓ | 99.5% |
| Data-center count | 7 | 23✓ |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €5.75 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €2.16 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | Lithuania, Amsterdam, Chicago, Singapore, Stockholm, Frankfurt, Tokyo | [US x6, London, Frankfurt, Amsterdam, Sao Paulo, Mexico City, Buenos Aires, Bogota, Santiago, Singapore, Tokyo, Sydney] |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | — | hourly billingnvme storageipv6eu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accesskubernetes support |
| Visit Latitude.sh → | ||
Cherry Servers
Pros
- + Low entry pricing: Cloud VPS from $3.24-3.51/mo, custom dedicated from $0.098/hr, with hourly billing
- + Up to 100 TB free egress per dedicated server; extra traffic from €0.50/TB — friendly to bandwidth-heavy workloads
- + 99.97% financially backed uptime SLA and default DDoS protection at no extra cost
- + Bare metal breadth: instant and fully custom builds up to 128 cores / 1152 GB RAM with optional GPUs
- + Seven locations across EU, US, and Asia; personal account manager and 24/7 chat for every customer
Cons
- - No managed Kubernetes, no S3-compatible object storage, no hyperscaler service ecosystem
- - Mid-sized provider (~60 staff); support depth beyond chat and account management is limited
- - Product pages are inconsistent (region counts, $3.24 vs $3.51 entry price) — the configurator is ground truth
- - Wide plan menu (spot, outlet, instant, custom, fixed-term vs on-demand) makes comparison effortful
Latitude.sh
Pros
- + Real bare metal with cloud-style API/Terraform provisioning in minutes
- + Published price list including GPU nodes (1x H100 at $1.68/hr on-demand)
- + 20 TB free outbound traffic per server, unmetered inbound
- + Latin American sites (Sao Paulo, Mexico City, Buenos Aires, Bogota, Santiago) few competitors match
- + Megaport backing and a $594M 2026 raise aimed at AI inference capacity
Cons
- - Unmanaged — no OS administration, and backups are not included
- - Published SLA is only 99.5% for bare-metal power/uplink and VM instances
- - Per-site stock limits; popular plans can exist in only one or two locations
- - Regional pricing differences (LATAM/APAC cost more than the US price)
- - Product direction in flux after the 2025 Megaport merger and AI pivot
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.