Checkly vs SigNoz
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Checkly and SigNoz.
Checkly Monitoring as code with Playwright and API checks | SigNoz Open source Datadog alternative — self-hostable | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 5.0 (100 reviews)✓ | 4.8 (329 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Engineering teams who want to define synthetic monitoring tests as code in their repository | Engineering teams who want a full observability stack they self-host to avoid Datadog pricing |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceapi access | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access |
| Visit Checkly → | Visit SigNoz → | |
Checkly
Pros
- + Monitoring as code in TypeScript
- + Playwright for browser monitoring
- + Works in CI/CD pipeline
Cons
- - Developer-focused — not for non-technical teams
- - Newer than Datadog synthetics
SigNoz
Pros
- + Full-stack: metrics + traces + logs
- + Self-hostable — no vendor lock-in
- + ClickHouse backend for high performance
Cons
- - Self-hosting requires operational knowledge
- - Less polished than Datadog
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.