Ceph vs Tigris
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Ceph and Tigris.
Quick Verdict
4.1/5
Ceph
0 reviews
4.1/5
Tigris
0 reviews
Both Ceph and Tigris are equally rated at 4.1/5. Open-source distributed storage system providing object, block, and file storage through a single cluster. Designed for organizations building cloud infrastructure or managing petabyte-scale data. Tigris is a globally distributed, S3-compatible object storage service with zero egress fees on every tier. Standing free tier (5 GB storage, 10k/100k requests monthly). Built by ex-Uber storage engineers; backs Fly.io storage and AI platforms.
Ceph Unified, scalable storage platform for objects, blocks, and files | Tigris Globally distributed S3-compatible object storage with zero egress fees | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.1 (0 reviews) | 4.1 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | free | freemium |
| Starting price | Free | Free tier available |
| Best for | Enterprises and service providers building self-managed, large-scale storage with object, block, and file requirements on commodity hardware | AI/ML teams and developers whose data is read from many regions and clouds — especially where egress fees dominate — who want S3 compatibility without hyperscaler lock-in |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | — |
| RAM | — | — |
| Storage | — | 5 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | — |
| Data-center count | — | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostables3 compatible | free tiers3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Ceph → | Visit Tigris → | |
Ceph
Pros
- + Unified object, block, and file storage from one self-healing cluster with no single point of failure
- + Free and open source (LGPL 2.1/3.0) under Linux Foundation governance
- + Proven at very large scale — CERN, OVH, DigitalOcean run production deployments
- + S3-compatible object API (RGW), erasure coding, replication, snapshots and clones built in
- + Strong Kubernetes story (Rook, Ceph CSI) and modern ops tooling (cephadm, dashboard, Prometheus)
Cons
- - Steep learning curve; incident response and tuning require real storage expertise
- - Practical minimum is a multi-node cluster (3+ monitors, ~4 GiB RAM per OSD, 10 Gb/s networking)
- - Total cost of ownership dominated by hardware and operations, not licenses
- - Vendor ecosystem in flux (SUSE exited Ceph-based products from 2021)
Tigris
Pros
- + Zero egress fees on every tier and every direction — regional, cross-region, and internet
- + Full published rate card (plus a machine-readable pricing page) with identical pricing across geographies
- + Standing free tier with no card: 5 GB Standard storage, 10,000 Class A and 100,000 Class B requests monthly
- + S3-compatible API (>90% coverage) with a zero-downtime migration path — low switching cost
- + Fork, snapshot, soft delete and object events at no separate enablement cost; SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA BAA available
Cons
- - Young vendor (founded 2022, Series A stage) holding the durability of your data layer
- - No public uptime SLA outside Enterprise contracts
- - Single product line — no compute, CDN, or identity integration beyond S3-style access keys
- - Cold-tier minimum retention billing (30/90 days) can surprise lifecycle-driven workloads
- - Object notification events cost from the first event ($0.01 per 1,000)
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.