Ceph vs Bunny.net
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Ceph and Bunny.net.
Quick Verdict
4.1/5
Ceph
0 reviews
4.2/5
Bunny.net
0 reviews
Bunny.net is rated higher (4.2 vs 4.1). Open-source distributed storage system providing object, block, and file storage through a single cluster. Designed for organizations building cloud infrastructure or managing petabyte-scale data. Low-cost content delivery network and edge platform with pay-as-you-go pricing from $0.01/GB (Europe & North America; other regions $0.03-0.06/GB), plus S3-compatible storage, video streaming and image optimization. 119 PoPs, 99.99% SLA.
Ceph Unified, scalable storage platform for objects, blocks, and files | Bunny.net Global CDN and object storage with per-gigabyte pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.1 (0 reviews) | 4.2 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | free | usage-based |
| Starting price | Free✓ | From $1/mo |
| Best for | Enterprises and service providers building self-managed, large-scale storage with object, block, and file requirements on commodity hardware | Cost-sensitive global delivery of static content, media, and downloads — publishers, SaaS asset delivery, indie streaming, software distribution |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 0 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 0 GB |
| Storage | — | 0 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 0 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.99% |
| Data-center count | — | 119 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | 119 PoPs (Standard network) + 10 PoPs (Volume network); 15 storage regions |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostables3 compatible | free tiers3 compatibleddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessipv6 |
| Visit Ceph → | Visit Bunny.net → | |
Ceph
Pros
- + Unified object, block, and file storage from one self-healing cluster with no single point of failure
- + Free and open source (LGPL 2.1/3.0) under Linux Foundation governance
- + Proven at very large scale — CERN, OVH, DigitalOcean run production deployments
- + S3-compatible object API (RGW), erasure coding, replication, snapshots and clones built in
- + Strong Kubernetes story (Rook, Ceph CSI) and modern ops tooling (cephadm, dashboard, Prometheus)
Cons
- - Steep learning curve; incident response and tuning require real storage expertise
- - Practical minimum is a multi-node cluster (3+ monitors, ~4 GiB RAM per OSD, 10 Gb/s networking)
- - Total cost of ownership dominated by hardware and operations, not licenses
- - Vendor ecosystem in flux (SUSE exited Ceph-based products from 2021)
Bunny.net
Pros
- + Among the cheapest delivery rates on the market: $0.01/GB in Europe/North America with no request fees
- + A written 99.99% SLA with a published outage-credit schedule — rare at this price tier
- + S3-compatible storage with free delivery to Bunny CDN, free API egress, and no request charges
- + Perma-Cache, SafeHop origin retries, edge rules, free Let's Encrypt SSL, and DDoS mitigation included
- + Clear region-based pricing, overcharge protection, and payment by card, PayPal, or crypto
Cons
- - Regional bandwidth multipliers (up to 6x for Middle East/Africa) can triple costs for skewed audiences
- - Lean support organization — no named TAMs or enterprise support tiers on standard plans
- - Shallower storage tooling than S3: no cold tier, limited lifecycle automation, replication capped by region count
- - Smaller ecosystem and third-party integration surface than CloudFront, Cloudflare, or Fastly
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.