jsDelivr vs ImageKit.io
A detailed comparison to help you choose between jsDelivr and ImageKit.io.
Quick Verdict
4.3/5
jsDelivr
0 reviews
3.9/5
ImageKit.io
0 reviews
jsDelivr is rated higher (4.3 vs 3.9). jsDelivr is a free CDN for open source npm and GitHub packages. Serve any npm package from the CDN with automatic versioning. Used by millions of websites. No setup required. ImageKit.io delivers optimized images globally through its CDN with on-the-fly transformations. Built for developers who need fast image delivery without manual optimization workflows.
jsDelivr Free CDN for open source JavaScript packages |  ImageKit.io Real-time image optimization and CDN for faster web performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.3 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.9 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | free | freemium |
| Starting price | Free | Free tier available |
| Best for | Websites and developers serving open source JavaScript, CSS, and library assets from npm, GitHub, or WordPress plugins via CDN | Development and marketing teams managing product imagery, user-generated content, or large media libraries who want automated optimization and DAM without dedicated image engineering |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | Global multi-CDN: Cloudflare, Fastly, Bunny, Gcore plus custom servers | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen source | free tierapi access |
| Visit jsDelivr → | Visit ImageKit.io → | |
jsDelivr
Pros
- + Completely free with no bandwidth limits or premium tiers
- + Multi-CDN delivery (Cloudflare, Fastly, Bunny, Gcore) with 540+ points of presence
- + Proven at very large scale — hundreds of billions of requests per month
- + Version pinning, semver ranges, purge API, stats API, ESM support (esm.run)
- + Absorbed BootstrapCDN, RawGit, and OSSCDN — broad legacy URL coverage
Cons
- - No SLA, no support contract, no uptime guarantee — offered as-is
- - Open source files only (npm, GitHub, WordPress plugins); not for private application assets
- - Upstream package removals or policy decisions can take files offline
- - Sponsorship-funded and small-team operated; support is best-effort
ImageKit.io
Pros
- + Transformations are not billed — pricing runs on bandwidth, storage, video units, extension units, seats, and purges
- + Genuine free tier with the full processing feature surface (20 GB bandwidth, 3 GB DAM storage)
- + Amazon CloudFront delivery with seven AWS processing regions and bring-your-own-CDN support
- + Storage-agnostic origins: S3, GCS, Azure Blob, or the built-in media library
- + Broad AI operation set (background removal, upscaling, generative fill, auto-tagging) plus DAM in one platform
Cons
- - Uptime commitment percentage is defined in the terms but not publicly legible
- - Video and extension "units" make bill forecasting hard before a test month
- - Free and Lite bandwidth caps (20 GB / 40 GB) are easy to hit on a busy site
- - Collaboration and DAM governance features are gated at Pro ($89/month) and Enterprise
- - No independent performance record; edge-reach figures are CloudFront's, not ImageKit's
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.