Caddy vs Hetzner Load Balancer
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Caddy and Hetzner Load Balancer.
Caddy Automatic HTTPS load balancer and web server | Hetzner Load Balancer Managed load balancing with Layer 4/7 support and auto-scaling integration | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.9 (14 reviews)✓ | 4.0 (47 reviews) |
| Pricing model | free | paid |
| Starting price | Free✓ | From €6/mo |
| Best for | Developers wanting a load balancer/reverse proxy with automatic SSL that requires minimal configuration | Teams running applications on Hetzner Cloud who need straightforward, managed load balancing without vendor lock-in concerns. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostable | managed optioneu datacenterus datacenter |
| Visit Caddy → | Visit Hetzner Load Balancer → | |
Caddy
Pros
- + Automatic HTTPS — no SSL configuration needed
- + Simple Caddyfile configuration
- + Built-in load balancing and reverse proxy
Cons
- - Less performance than Nginx at extreme load
- - Smaller community than Nginx
Hetzner Load Balancer
Pros
- + Scale traffic handling without modifying application code
- + Terminate SSL/TLS encryption at the load balancer to reduce backend load
- + Configure round-robin, least connections, or IP-hash distribution algorithms
- + Monitor backend health with customizable check intervals and thresholds
Cons
- - Limited feature parity if comparing advanced options from AWS ELB or Google Cloud Load Balancer
- - Only cost-effective if already using Hetzner Cloud for backend infrastructure
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.