Skip to content

Bunny.net vs Ceph

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Bunny.net and Ceph.

Quick Verdict

4.2/5

Bunny.net

0 reviews

4.1/5

Ceph

0 reviews

Bunny.net is rated higher (4.2 vs 4.1). Low-cost content delivery network and edge platform with pay-as-you-go pricing from $0.01/GB (Europe & North America; other regions $0.03-0.06/GB), plus S3-compatible storage, video streaming and image optimization. 119 PoPs, 99.99% SLA. Open-source distributed storage system providing object, block, and file storage through a single cluster. Designed for organizations building cloud infrastructure or managing petabyte-scale data.

Bunny.net

Bunny.net

Global CDN and object storage with per-gigabyte pricing

Ceph

Ceph

Unified, scalable storage platform for objects, blocks, and files

Overview
Rating4.2 (0 reviews)✓4.1 (0 reviews)
Pricing modelusage-basedfree
Starting priceFrom $1/moFree✓
Best forCost-sensitive global delivery of static content, media, and downloads — publishers, SaaS asset delivery, indie streaming, software distributionEnterprises and service providers building self-managed, large-scale storage with object, block, and file requirements on commodity hardware
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores0 vCPU—
RAM0 GB—
Storage0 GB—
Bandwidth0 TB/mo—
SLA uptime99.99%—
Data-center count119—
Features
IPv6✓
DDoS protection✓
Automated backups
Snapshots✓
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
119 PoPs (Standard network) + 10 PoPs (Volume network); 15 storage regions
—
Tags
Tags
free tiers3 compatibleddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessipv6
free tieropen sourceself hostables3 compatible
Visit Bunny.net →Visit Ceph →

Bunny.net

Pros

  • + Among the cheapest delivery rates on the market: $0.01/GB in Europe/North America with no request fees
  • + A written 99.99% SLA with a published outage-credit schedule — rare at this price tier
  • + S3-compatible storage with free delivery to Bunny CDN, free API egress, and no request charges
  • + Perma-Cache, SafeHop origin retries, edge rules, free Let's Encrypt SSL, and DDoS mitigation included
  • + Clear region-based pricing, overcharge protection, and payment by card, PayPal, or crypto

Cons

  • - Regional bandwidth multipliers (up to 6x for Middle East/Africa) can triple costs for skewed audiences
  • - Lean support organization — no named TAMs or enterprise support tiers on standard plans
  • - Shallower storage tooling than S3: no cold tier, limited lifecycle automation, replication capped by region count
  • - Smaller ecosystem and third-party integration surface than CloudFront, Cloudflare, or Fastly
View full Bunny.netreview →

Ceph

Pros

  • + Unified object, block, and file storage from one self-healing cluster with no single point of failure
  • + Free and open source (LGPL 2.1/3.0) under Linux Foundation governance
  • + Proven at very large scale — CERN, OVH, DigitalOcean run production deployments
  • + S3-compatible object API (RGW), erasure coding, replication, snapshots and clones built in
  • + Strong Kubernetes story (Rook, Ceph CSI) and modern ops tooling (cephadm, dashboard, Prometheus)

Cons

  • - Steep learning curve; incident response and tuning require real storage expertise
  • - Practical minimum is a multi-node cluster (3+ monitors, ~4 GiB RAM per OSD, 10 Gb/s networking)
  • - Total cost of ownership dominated by hardware and operations, not licenses
  • - Vendor ecosystem in flux (SUSE exited Ceph-based products from 2021)
View full Cephreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.