Buddy vs Shuttle
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Buddy and Shuttle.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
Buddy
0 reviews
3.4/5
Shuttle
0 reviews
Buddy is rated higher (3.9 vs 3.4). Buddy is a DevOps automation platform with 150+ actions for building, testing, and deploying to any server or cloud. Visual pipeline builder, Docker support, and good free tier. Shuttle deploys Rust backend services with zero configuration — annotate your code with macros and Shuttle handles the infrastructure. No YAML, no Terraform. Pay-per-use serverless Rust.
Buddy DevOps automation with 150+ deployment actions | Shuttle Deploy Rust backends from your code — no config | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.4 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Small-to-mid teams, especially in Europe, that want visual CI/CD with mixed Linux/Windows/macOS runners and prefer per-minute metering over YAML maintenance | Rust developers — solo or small teams — who want a backend live in minutes from annotated code and can accept a London-only region and no contractual uptime guarantee. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 0 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 1 GB |
| Storage | — | 1 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | — |
| Data-center count | — | 1 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €0.00 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | AWS eu-west-2 (London) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi accessteam features | free tieropen sourceus datacenter |
| Visit Buddy → | Visit Shuttle → | |
Buddy
Pros
- + Visual pipeline builder with YAML pipelines as an escape hatch — editable by both terminal and non-terminal users
- + Transparent usage metering with worked cost examples on the pricing page
- + Free plan includes all features except SSO and advanced permissions, with $1/month usage credit
- + Linux, Windows, and macOS VM runners on Intel and ARM cover desktop and mobile builds in one tool
- + Sandbox previews with custom domains, plus Terraform, tunnels, CLI, and API across all plans
Cons
- - Free workspaces are frozen after 60 days of inactivity and permanently terminated 30 days later
- - SSO and advanced permissions gated behind the $299/month Team plan
- - Seats, concurrency slots, and compute usage are three separate meters that stack on busy teams
- - Smaller action ecosystem than GitHub Actions; no self-hosted runners on your own hardware
- - macOS VM usage is billed at 6x the memory rate — iOS builds get expensive quickly
Shuttle
Pros
- + Infrastructure from code annotations: databases, secrets and static assets provisioned from function signatures, no YAML or Terraform
- + Real free tier (0.25 vCPU, 0.5 GB RAM, 0.5 GB database, 100 build minutes/month) with custom domain support
- + Published, itemized usage rates ($0.12/GB storage, $0.025/build minute, $0.10/GB egress) instead of sales-quoted pricing
- + Clear isolation tiering: spot instances on free, reserved VM-isolated instances from Pro
- + First-class Rust framework support (Axum, Actix Web, Rocket, Serenity) and open-source platform code
Cons
- - Rust only — other language stacks are not supported today
- - Single AWS region (London, eu-west-2) with no region choice below the not-yet-available Enterprise tier
- - No published uptime SLA on any current tier; support is Discord-based with 1-business-day response on Pro
- - Steep jump from $20/mo Pro to $250/mo Growth, with metered usage on top of every paid tier
- - Tier contents have changed materially over time (projects and included egress were cut in 2025)
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.