Buddy vs LucidLink
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Buddy and LucidLink.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
Buddy
0 reviews
4.0/5
LucidLink
0 reviews
LucidLink is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.9). Buddy is a DevOps automation platform with 150+ actions for building, testing, and deploying to any server or cloud. Visual pipeline builder, Docker support, and good free tier. LucidLink turns S3 object storage into a shared, streaming cloud filesystem for teams working with large files.
Buddy DevOps automation with 150+ deployment actions | LucidLink Cloud file streaming for teams: a shared filesystem on top of S3 object storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From $7/mo |
| Best for | Small-to-mid teams, especially in Europe, that want visual CI/CD with mixed Linux/Windows/macOS runners and prefer per-minute metering over YAML maintenance | Creative and production teams (video, audio, VFX, design) with large shared files and distributed members who need one live filesystem without syncing or shipping drives. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi accessteam features | — |
| Visit Buddy → | ||
Buddy
Pros
- + Visual pipeline builder with YAML pipelines as an escape hatch — editable by both terminal and non-terminal users
- + Transparent usage metering with worked cost examples on the pricing page
- + Free plan includes all features except SSO and advanced permissions, with $1/month usage credit
- + Linux, Windows, and macOS VM runners on Intel and ARM cover desktop and mobile builds in one tool
- + Sandbox previews with custom domains, plus Terraform, tunnels, CLI, and API across all plans
Cons
- - Free workspaces are frozen after 60 days of inactivity and permanently terminated 30 days later
- - SSO and advanced permissions gated behind the $299/month Team plan
- - Seats, concurrency slots, and compute usage are three separate meters that stack on busy teams
- - Smaller action ecosystem than GitHub Actions; no self-hosted runners on your own hardware
- - macOS VM usage is billed at 6x the memory rate — iOS builds get expensive quickly
LucidLink
Pros
- + Streams large shared files on demand — no full downloads before work starts
- + Zero-knowledge encryption: the vendor cannot read customer content
- + Transparent published per-member pricing with included storage per seat
- + Built on S3, with bring-your-own-S3 on Enterprise for storage-substrate flexibility
- + 30-day free trial without a credit card; desktop, mobile and web clients
- + TeamCache add-on brings cloud files to on-prem users at LAN speed
Cons
- - Storage overage of $7-8 per 100 GB is roughly $70-80 per TB per month — far above raw S3
- - Starter tier is tightly capped: 10 members, 1 filespace, 1 TB, and no snapshot recovery
- - Specialized for file-streaming workloads; wrong shape for databases or block storage
- - No published region list or public uptime SLA outside Enterprise discussions
- - Client and control-plane dependency on a mid-size specialist vendor
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.