BorgBackup vs Hetzner Storage Box
A detailed comparison to help you choose between BorgBackup and Hetzner Storage Box.
BorgBackup Open source deduplicating backup — free self-hosted | Hetzner Storage Box Affordable, reliable cloud storage with SFTP and NFS access | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.2 (223 reviews) | 4.5 (47 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | free | paid |
| Starting price | Free✓ | From €3/mo |
| Best for | System administrators wanting the most efficient open source backup tool for Linux servers | Small to mid-sized teams and developers in Europe needing affordable backup storage or file hosting without vendor lock-in to hyperscale providers. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostable | eu datacentergdpr compliant |
| Visit BorgBackup → | Visit Hetzner Storage Box → | |
BorgBackup
Pros
- + Deduplication reduces storage dramatically
- + Strong encryption built-in
- + Free and open source
Cons
- - Command-line only — no GUI
- - Requires server knowledge to set up
Hetzner Storage Box
Pros
- + Access via SFTP, SMB, NFS, and WebDAV for flexible integration
- + Unlimited bandwidth for transfers between Storage Box and Hetzner Cloud products
- + Automatic daily and weekly snapshots included at no extra cost
- + Transparent, predictable pricing with no surprise fees
- + German data centers with GDPR compliance built-in
Cons
- - Limited to Hetzner ecosystem for bandwidth benefits; external transfers may incur costs
- - No native S3 API support, requiring workarounds for S3-dependent applications
- - Smaller feature set compared to AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, or Azure Blob Storage
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.