Better Stack (Uptime) vs SigNoz
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Better Stack (Uptime) and SigNoz.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Better Stack (Uptime)
0 reviews
4.0/5
SigNoz
0 reviews
Both Better Stack (Uptime) and SigNoz are equally rated at 4.0/5. Better Stack Uptime monitors your servers and websites for downtime, sends alerts through multiple channels, and automates incident response workflows. Built for DevOps teams and SaaS companies. SigNoz is a full-stack open source observability platform — metrics, traces, and logs in one. Datadog alternative you can self-host. Uses ClickHouse for efficient storage.
Better Stack (Uptime) Uptime monitoring with incident response automation | SigNoz Open-source observability platform for logs, metrics, and traces | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | From $29/mo | Free tier available✓ |
| Best for | Small-to-medium SaaS teams and solo operators who want uptime checks, on-call paging, and a customer-facing status page in one reasonably priced product. | Engineering teams priced out of Datadog or New Relic that want OpenTelemetry-native logs, metrics and traces with computable usage-based costs and US/EU/India data residency. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | Global | United States, European Union, India (SigNoz Cloud regions) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi access | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access |
| Visit Better Stack (Uptime) → | Visit SigNoz → | |
Better Stack (Uptime)
Pros
- + Real free tier: 10 monitors, 10 heartbeats, one status page, 3-minute checks
- + Per-responder pricing with unlimited phone/SMS alerts and unlimited non-paged team members
- + Multi-location verification before alerts; error screenshots, traceroute/MTR, second-by-second timelines
- + Status pages, on-call rotations, escalation policies, and Slack-native incident handling in one product
- + Playwright transaction monitoring and broad integrations (PagerDuty, Grafana, Prometheus, cloud watchers)
Cons
- - No published SLA for the monitoring service itself and no public probe-location list
- - Per-responder pricing gets expensive for large on-call rotations
- - Free-tier checks are 3-minute intervals; 30-second checks require paid plans
- - Telemetry meters (logs, metrics, RUM, exceptions) can drive the bill well beyond the monitoring baseline
- - Product surface has grown into full observability, adding pricing complexity
SigNoz
Pros
- + Usage-based pricing with published per-unit rates ($0.30/GB logs and traces, $0.10/mn metric samples) and no per-user or per-host billing
- + OpenTelemetry-native: no proprietary SDKs, so instrumentation does not lock you in
- + Logs, metrics, traces, APM, exceptions and alerts correlated in one ClickHouse-backed product
- + Self-hostable open-source community edition plus cloud regions in the US, EU and India with SOC2 Type II and HIPAA compliance
- + Worked pricing examples and a bill calculator published — costs are computable before you commit
Cons
- - No published uptime SLA below the Enterprise tier (from $4,000/month)
- - Self-hosted community edition makes storage, scaling, upgrades and backups your operational problem
- - Usage bills move with retention choices and noisy telemetry; the $49 entry tier shows a struck-through $199 base price
- - Narrower turnkey integration ecosystem than Datadog; RBAC is beta and audit logs/multi-tenancy are roadmap items
- - Migration tooling and dedicated Slack support are gated at spends above $999/month
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.