Backblaze B2 vs Restic
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Backblaze B2 and Restic.
Backblaze B2 S3-compatible storage at a quarter of AWS S3 pricing | Restic Fast, secure, encrypted open source backup | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.5 (110 reviews) | 4.6 (40 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | free |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free |
| Best for | Developers and startups who need S3-compatible storage at the lowest possible price and don't require EU data residency | Developers and sysadmins wanting a flexible, encrypted backup tool that can target any storage backend |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 0 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 0 GB | — |
| Storage | 0 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | 0 TB/mo | — |
| SLA uptime | 99.9% | — |
| Data-center count | 2 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | United States | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiers3 compatibleus datacenterapi access | free tieropen source |
| Visit Backblaze B2 → | Visit Restic → | |
Backblaze B2
Pros
- + $6/TB/month — significantly cheaper than AWS S3
- + Free egress when paired with Cloudflare
- + S3-compatible API — drop-in replacement
Cons
- - US-only datacenters — no EU data residency option
- - No EU-based storage
Restic
Pros
- + Backs up to any storage backend — S3, B2, GCS, SFTP
- + Strong AES-256 encryption
- + No server — single binary
Cons
- - Command-line only
- - Repository management can be complex
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.