Skip to content

Azure Functions vs Convex

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Azure Functions and Convex.

Quick Verdict

4.0/5

Azure Functions

0 reviews

4.0/5

Convex

0 reviews

Both Azure Functions and Convex are equally rated at 4.0/5. Azure Functions is Microsoft's serverless platform. 1M free executions/month. Durable Functions for long-running workflows. Best integration with .NET, Microsoft 365, and Azure services. Convex is a backend-as-a-service that provides a reactive database with real-time subscriptions, serverless functions, file storage, and authentication. TypeScript-first developer experience.

Azure Functions

Azure Functions

Microsoft serverless functions for .NET teams

Convex

Convex

TypeScript-first backend platform with real-time sync and serverless functions

Overview
Rating4.0 (0 reviews)4.0 (0 reviews)
Pricing modelusage-basedfreemium
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forMicrosoft/.NET teams building event-driven processing, workflows (Durable Functions), and spiky APIs inside the Azure ecosystemTypeScript teams building real-time, collaborative or AI-agent applications who want to replace an assembled backend stack with one reactive platform and value developer velocity over infrastructure control.
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores——
RAM——
Storage—1 GB
Bandwidth——
SLA uptime——
Data-center count—3
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection✓
Automated backups✓
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions—
US East (N. Virginia), EU West, Canada Central
Tags
Tags
free tierapi accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter
free tierapi access
Visit Azure Functions →Visit Convex →

Azure Functions

Pros

  • + Permanent free grant of 1 million executions and 400,000 GB-s per month
  • + Trigger/binding integrations cover most Azure and third-party services declaratively
  • + Durable Functions for stateful orchestration — the strongest workflow story among serverless platforms
  • + Hosting plan ladder (Consumption, Flex, Premium, Dedicated, Container Apps) covers most cost/performance points
  • + 99.95% SLA with service credits scaling up to 100% below 95% uptime

Cons

  • - Cold starts on Consumption hurt latency-sensitive HTTP workloads
  • - Per-instance limits (1.5 GB RAM, 1 core) cap what single functions can do
  • - Azure surface area: storage account, monitoring, identity, and networking costs stack up
  • - Bindings and Durable Functions abstractions lock integration logic to Azure
  • - Premium costs real money whether or not traffic flows (EP1 ~$146/month US rates)
View full Azure Functionsreview →

Convex

Pros

  • + Replaces a whole backend stack — database, functions, sync, search, storage and auth — with end-to-end TypeScript type safety and ACID transactions
  • + Generous economics for reactive apps: query/mutation compute free on serverless, plus a real free plan and pay-as-you-go Starter tier
  • + All unit rates and per-tier limits published, including an honest 1.3x regional multiplier for EU and Canada
  • + Core backend open-sourced (March 2024) with self-hosting option — genuine lock-in relief uncommon in this category
  • + Well-funded ($110.5M through a $57M Series B in 2026), SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA compliant, with named production customers at real scale

Cons

  • - Document model is not SQL — poor fit for Postgres estates, analyst workflows and BI tooling
  • - Usage-based metering can surprise chatty clients; no hard spend caps on paid tiers
  • - Support SLAs are a paid feature: 30-minute P1 response only in $1,000–$2,000/month premier tiers
  • - TypeScript-first to the point of exclusion — a non-starter for non-TS teams
  • - Self-hosting the open-source backend is an operational project most teams will only use as an escape hatch
View full Convexreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.