Skip to content

AWS VPC vs Enclave Networks

A detailed comparison to help you choose between AWS VPC and Enclave Networks.

Quick Verdict

4.1/5

AWS VPC

0 reviews

3.5/5

Enclave Networks

0 reviews

AWS VPC is rated higher (4.1 vs 3.5). AWS VPC provides isolated virtual network environments in AWS. Subnets, route tables, internet gateways, NAT gateways, and security groups. Foundation of all AWS networking. Enclave Networks provides zero-trust connectivity for distributed teams, MSPs and infrastructure. It replaces traditional VPN with direct peer-to-peer tunnels that require no VPN server, no open firewall ports and no public IP exposure; connections fall back to Enclave-operated relays only when a direct path cannot be established.

AWS VPC

AWS VPC

Amazon Virtual Private Cloud for AWS infrastructure

Enclave Networks

Enclave Networks

Zero-trust private networking without VPN complexity

Overview
Rating4.1 (0 reviews)✓3.5 (0 reviews)
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forAWS-committed teams that need segmented networks, private subnets, and hybrid connectivity; overkill for single simple serversMSPs and IT teams connecting multi-site, multi-cloud or hybrid estates that want closed firewalls and policy-driven zero trust connectivity, with per-machine licensing that suits device fleets.
Features
IPv6✓
DDoS protection✓
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing✓
Free tier
Tags
Tags
free tierapi accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter
free tierapi access
Visit AWS VPC →Visit Enclave Networks →

AWS VPC

Pros

  • + Free core service — no charge for VPCs, subnets, route tables, or security groups
  • + Deepest virtual networking feature set available: peering, Transit Gateway, PrivateLink, flow logs, traffic mirroring
  • + 39 Regions / 120+ Availability Zones with real multi-AZ fault isolation
  • + Native IPv6 (dual-stack and IPv6-only) at no extra charge
  • + Free baseline DDoS protection via AWS Shield Standard

Cons

  • - NAT gateways add up fast: $0.045/hour per AZ plus $0.045/GB processed
  • - No SLA attached to VPC itself
  • - Architecture-level cost opacity — public IPv4, cross-AZ and egress charges interact
  • - Steep learning curve and AWS lock-in once topology grows
View full AWS VPCreview →

Enclave Networks

Pros

  • + Per-enrolled-system pricing is simple and predictable ($8.00/mo list, $7.33/mo annual)
  • + Strong cryptographic defaults: Ed25519 certificates, per-session Curve25519 ECDHE with forward secrecy, AES256-GCM tunnels
  • + No VPN concentrator, no open firewall ports, no network reconfiguration — direct peer-to-peer tunnels
  • + Multi-tenant portal and subnet gateways fit MSP and multi-site operations well
  • + SSO/OIDC trust requirements (Entra ID, Okta, Google, Duo, JumpCloud) gate tunnel establishment
  • + Generous honesty in the docs, including a frank explanation of relay fallbacks and their cost

Cons

  • - Every container and every machine counts as a paid enrolled system — costs grow with fleet size
  • - Free tier is non-commercial only (5 systems); no free commercial usage
  • - Relayed fallback paths traverse Enclave-operated servers with higher latency and lower throughput
  • - No published uptime SLA or third-party audit report we could find
  • - Small vendor (Wales, small-company filings) with a thinner ecosystem than the consumer mesh brands
View full Enclave Networksreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.